>>1206157

Peace in Korea is not nothing.

Nice thinking, anon.

>>1205989

meant to be a reply to this:

>>1206246

>>1206249

It's clear from reading the first few pages that there are gaps in the text messages – missing messages, fragments of conversations.

But it occurs to me while reading that by releasing these specific messages, the DOJ are showing (((them))) that this is not a BLUFF, that they really do have it all, they simply didn't release it all.

Now (((they))) get to decide if they want to continue playing, or throw in their cards.

Poker.

>>1206608

Did POTUS make references to swamp as early as 2013?

>>1206703