Anonymous ID: 90831a Dec. 17, 2020, 7:12 a.m. No.12065477   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5498 >>5503 >>5536 >>5539 >>5551

>>12065438

Trump isn't going to declare war on China.

 

POTUS is COORDINATING with China to eliminate the nwo.

 

War has already been in effect, it's an information war.

 

Bullets and bombers are to kill the violent aspects of the nwo. That aspect is all but gone.

 

All that is left is a cornered trapped panicking corrupt media establishment, corrupt big tech, and a few albeit loud neckbeard nerdvirgin shills on 8kun pretending to be all powerful by repeating Goebbels tactic fake news as if that will ever work on autists and anons.

Anonymous ID: 90831a Dec. 17, 2020, 7:19 a.m. No.12065541   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12065483

When he says he finds it very sad to watch, he means the fate of the Biden crime family. The word 'Actually' to me delineates fake news and the Biden crime family.

Anonymous ID: 90831a Dec. 17, 2020, 7:25 a.m. No.12065589   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5607

>>12065568

Well obviously the presumption is that Q wouldn't ask that if it wasn't already the case.

Statements phrased in the form of questions ensures plausible deniability and no breaking of NATSEC.

Anonymous ID: 90831a Dec. 17, 2020, 7:58 a.m. No.12065842   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5854

>>12065562

Well that's just it isn't it.

 

When you see a question from Q, it signifies a tacit statement.

You're right, if we limit the information set to ONLY that question, there is no way to tell if it is true or disinfo.

But that's exactly why we shouldn't limit the set to just that question, instead need to connect it with other information.

Such as:

Why did it occur over the last couple of weeks that a whole bunch of information about China 'owning' Democrat politicians was made public?

Just like POTUS did not want to disclose about UK until UK is/was ready, so too would it have to be the case that disclosures on China owning Democrat politicians wouldn't be made public without China being on board.

Also, POTUS has never, not once, insulted the 'honor' of President Xi. He's indicated he's not happy with him, that he should have spoken up about China virus sooner, etc, but he never treated Xi as an 'enemy of the state'.

Then consider the fact that POTUS was invited to the Forbidden Palace. In Chinese culture that is highly highly significant. No other world leader has ever been invited the way POTUS was.

Then I consider how information wars are fought, where friends pretend to be enemies to fake out mutual enemies, etc.

I look past the 'fog of war' information noise and ask what better explanation is there?