Concluding Observations

From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated

strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket. Indeed, the patterns

of election irregularities observed in this report are so consistent across the six battleground states

that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election, then to strategically game the

election process in such a way as to unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris

ticket.

A major part of this “stuff the ballot box” strategy has been aptly summarized in a complaint filed

before the US Supreme Court by the State of Texas:

Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, [Democrat] government

officials [in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin] usurped their

legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election

statutes. They accomplished these statutory revisions through executive fiat or

friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity.146

According to the Texas complaint – which the Supreme Court sadly refused to hear – the goal of

this strategy was to flood the battleground states “with millions of ballots to be sent through the

mails, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody.” At the same time, Democrat

government officials also sought to “weaken the strongest security measures protecting the

integrity of the vote signature verification and witness requirements.”1

The findings of the assessment conducted in this report are consistent with the Texas complaint.

Key takeaways include:

 The weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities uncovered in this report are such that

it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim that there is “no

evidence” of fraud or irregularities.

 The ballots that have come into question because of the identified election irregularities are

more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a

relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.

 While all six battleground states exhibit most, or all, six dimensions of election

irregularities, each state has a unique mix of issues that might be considered “most

important.” To put this another way, all battleground states are characterized by the same

or similar election irregularities; but, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each battleground

state is different in its own election irregularity way.

 This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather

than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity.

 In refusing to investigate a growing number of legitimate grievances, the anti-Trump media

and censoring social media are complicit in shielding the American public from the truth.

This is a dangerous game that simultaneously undermines the credibility of the media and

the stability of our political system and Republic.

 Those journalists, pundits, and political leaders now participating in what has become a

Biden Whitewash should acknowledge the six dimensions of election irregularities and

conduct the appropriate investigations to determine the truth about the 2020 election. If

this is not done before Inauguration Day, we risk putting into power an illegitimate and

illegal president lacking the support of a large segment of the American people.

 The failure to aggressively and fully investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities

assessed in this report is a signal failure not just of our anti-Trump mainstream media and

censoring social media but also of both our legislative and judicial branches.

o Republican governors in Arizona and Georgia together with Republican majorities

in both chambers of the State Legislatures of five of the six battleground states –

Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin148

– have had both the

power and the opportunity to investigate the six dimensions of election

irregularities presented in this report. Yet, wilting under intense political pressure,

these politicians have failed in their Constitutional duties and responsibilities to do

so – and thereby failed both their states and this nation as well as their party.

o Both State courts and Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have failed the

American people in refusing to appropriately adjudicate the election irregularities

that have come before them. Their failures pose a great risk to the American

Republic.

 If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and

thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able

to have a fair presidential election again – with the down-ballot Senate races scheduled for

January 5 in Georgia an initial test case of this looming risk.

ENDNOTES

1 All witnesses who have signed sworn affidavits or declarations who are referenced in this report but whose names

are not referenced in the public record, e.g., a court case, are referred to as “Jane Doe” or “John Doe” based on gender.

This has been done to ensure their safety and security.

2 Ballotopedia, “Partisan composition of state legislatures,” December 4, 2020.

https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures

3 Bump, Philip. “The two states that almost always predict which candidate is headed for defeat,” The Washington

Post, 7 September 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/07/the-two-states-that-almost-

always-predict-which-candidate-is-headed-for-defeat/

*The two Democrat candidate exceptions were John F. Kennedy in 1960 and Bill Clinton in 1992.

4 Williams, Pete. "Trump's election fight includes over 50 lawsuits. It's not going well.” NBC News, November 23,

1. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-s-election-fight-includes-over-30-lawsuits-it-s-

n1248289

5 All witnesses who have signed sworn affidavits and declarations referenced in this report are referred to as “Jane

Doe” and “John Doe” based on gender, in order to ensure their safety and security.

6 Bannon, Steve, War Room Pandemic, https://pandemic.warroom.org/

7 Solomon, John, Just the News, https://justthenews.com/john-solomon

8 Kassam, Raheem, National Pulse, https://americasvoice.news/the-national-pulse/

9 Newsmax, https://www.newsmax.com/

10 One America News Network, https://www.oann.com/

11“Most Say Mail-In Voting Worked, But 47% Say Fraud Likely.” Rasmussen Reports, December 7, 2020.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/most_say_mail_in_voting_work

ed_but_47_say_fraud_likely

12 Legal Information Institute, “Bribery,” Cornell University, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bribery

13 Bedard, Paul, “Pro-Biden effort offered Native Americans $25-$500 Visa gift cards and jewelry to vote,”

Washington Examiner, December 14, 2020. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/pro-biden-

effort-offered-native-americans-25-500-visa-gift-cards-jewelry-to-vote

14 Pentochoukov, Ivan, “Illegal Money-for-Votes Raffles Conducted in Several States in 2020 Election,” Epoch Times,

December 2, 2020. https://www.theepochtimes.com/illegal-money-for-votes-raffles-conducted-in-several-states-in-

2020-election_3598915.html

15 Morgan, Jessy. Testimony. “A truck driver with USPS says he was suspicious of his cargo load of 288,000

completed ballots.” December 1, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0xaA4dYsbQ

16 Declaration of John Doe, Delaware County Pennsylvania, November 9, 2020.

17 Bedard, Paul, “20 House Republicans demand Barr investigate ‘suitcases’ of ballots in Georgia,” The Washington

Examiner, December 4, 2020. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/20-house-gop-demand-ag-

barr-investigate-suitcases-of-ballots-in-georgia

18 “Trump Campaign lawyers present video 'evidence' of ballot fraud,” Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, December 4,

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ0xDWhWUxk

Real American Politics, December 4, 2020. https://twitter.com/RealAPolitics/status/1334754269052997635?s=20

19See, for example: Weber, Peter, “Georgia's top election investigator debunks a vote fraud conspiracy involving

'suitcases' of ballots, a urinal,” December 7, 2020. https://news.yahoo.com/georgias-top-election-investigator-

debunks-115236191.html

20 In the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tyler Bowyer et al v.. Doug Ducey, December 2,

1. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Bower-Complaint-AZ.pdf

21 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Cobb County, Georgia, November 12, 2020.

22 Declaration of Jane Doe, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, Nov 7, 2020

23 WisGOP, “WisGOP: Trump lawsuit highlights indefinitely confined voter increase,”

https://www.wispolitics.com/2020/wisgop-trump-lawsuit-highlights-indefinitely-confined-voter-increase/

24 WisGOP, “WisGOP: Some indefinitely confined voters are not indefinitely confined,”

https://www.wispolitics.com/2020/wisgop-some-indefinitely-confined-voters-are-not-indefinitely-confined/

25 WisGOP, “WisGOP: Some indefinitely confined voters are not indefinitely confined,”

https://www.wispolitics.com/2020/wisgop-some-indefinitely-confined-voters-are-not-indefinitely-confined/>>12067497

>>12067501

It should be clear at this point that all six battleground states suffer from most or all of the six

dimensions of election irregularities documented in this report. However, like Tolstoy’s unhappy

families, it is also true that each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way.

That is, each battleground state may be characterized by a unique mix of issues that,

impressionistically, might be considered “most important” in swinging that state for Joe Biden.

Consider Arizona, a state with the lowest alleged Biden victory margin at 10,457 votes. This is a

state with statistically improbable high voter turnouts in Maricopa and Pima counties; widespread

ballot mishandling; and 1.6 million mail-in ballots (which tended towards Biden) subjected to

much lower standards of certification and ID verification than in-person voters (who tended

towards Trump).

In Georgia, the alleged Biden victory margin was just 11,779 votes. What perhaps jumps out most

in the Peach State is the illegal Consent Decree that effectively gutted the signature match

requirements for millions of mail-in ballots. There is also the quite unresolved fake ballot

manufacturing matter of the roughly 100,000 ballots that were mysteriously pulled, in the dead of

night, out from underneath tables and expeditiously tabulated. Of course, we saw that Georgia’s

electoral version of a Three-card Monte sleight-of-hand led to a strong Biden vote surge.

Of all of the six battleground states which suffered from numerous observer and poll watcher

abuses, Michigan must rank as “first among equals.” With its “board up the windows” and “rough

up the observers” tactics, Detroit in Wayne County was the center of this “see no evil” universe.

When two local Republican officials tried to withhold certification of the votes in this county for

practices such as these and demanded an audit, they were subject to extreme intimidation and

“doxing” and quickly capitulated.143

As for Nevada, this is a state likewise with a very narrow alleged victory margin for Joe Biden –

33,596 votes. Here, voting machine irregularities associated with the Agilis machine have called

into question as many as 130,000 votes. There may also be an unusually large number of ballots

cast by out-of-state voters and others who did not meet residency requirements. Of course, the

brazen bribery of Native Americans to vote for Joe Biden is a dark stain on the state and the

Democrat Party.

144

In Pennsylvania, an equally brazen Democrat Secretary of State issued illegal guidance for the

acceptance of naked ballots and ignored direction from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to fix the

matter. She allowed ballots to be illegally cured in contravention of state law and pushed the legal

envelope for accepting ballots after Election Day.