Anonymous ID: 95e654 Dec. 17, 2020, 3:35 p.m. No.12071075   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12070782 pb

 

It's 3 years later, and time appears to be running out.

 

If we don't get our happy ending, the biggest splooge ever, (what about those 200K sealed indictments), or whatever it is that we end up getting, Trump is going to look like total shit in the history books.

 

I've never seen a situation like this that I can remember where, so late in the first term of the Presidency, that a handful of things would make the difference between great President and shitty President.

 

We've been talking about what a Royal Flush looks like, 4 aces and all that for 3 years now, but, unless that winning hand shows up, Trump looks like shitty president and not great president. If we can get some martial law, a bunch of kills, that'd work, or just a bunch of top kills without martial law, and Trump can do this even without fixing the election problem.

 

Scoreboard is pretty bare. None of us had Kevin Clinesmith in the top 100 we'd like to see punished, in the slightest way.

 

Sure, I'm looking forward to the Q story happening, like we all should be, but if that doesn't happen, he can throw a nuke on Atlanta, Philly, Detroit, Milwaukee, Las Vegas and Phoenix as a big ol fuck you. Really sorry I killed your base.

 

If we don't get something, Trump is, um, kinda shit, and definitely not on the list of "people I want to hear from ever again". If we don't get something there is nothing like a Trump movement or anything like that.

 

But, if we get the thing, the thing that we're here for because we want it, well, great, finally something good.

 

It's weird that it could be 100% or 0% at a stage of the process like this.

Anonymous ID: 95e654 Dec. 17, 2020, 3:40 p.m. No.12071133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1192

>>12071089

 

Doesn't seem likely. You can type out a bunch of reasons why you think it might be so.

 

A top level political consultant to the Democrat Party would not push forward the understanding that Rothschild and Soros are the ultimate baddies, responsible for this shit for decades and centuries.

 

They would hide all that information, and would definitely not place those 2 front and center.

Anonymous ID: 95e654 Dec. 17, 2020, 3:46 p.m. No.12071213   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12071029

 

If some crazy person killed the owner of a network, babbling something about how white women on TV aren't dating who they want, would that tend to fix the problem?

Anonymous ID: 95e654 Dec. 17, 2020, 3:54 p.m. No.12071293   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12071192

 

No, I'm not saying that what Q was saying with Rothschild and Soros was new and unusual information.

 

What I'm saying is that the Democrat operative would not push that information forward.

 

You see a month or so ago, Newt Gingrich was on Fox, and the announcers at Fox censored Newt, preventing him from talking about Soros.

 

"so it's verboten to talk about Soros"? - Newt. Or something like that. The verboten part is right, the quote is close.

 

Point being, Rothschild and Soros want to be making these calls, they want to meddle and control, and they want to be mentioned exactly Never.

 

The Democrat Operative simply would not push forward the Rothschild and Soros names for any additional scrutiny at all.