Anonymous ID: eaa5e0 Dec. 18, 2020, 1:57 p.m. No.12083478   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Northwestern University Removes Joseph Epstein After WSJ Op-Ed on Dr Jill Biden

 

Using a doctorate title in front of a name has recently sparked controversy in the U.S. after Wall Street Journal published an op-ed titled "Is There a Doctor in the White House? Not if You Need an M.D." The writer, Joseph Epstein, has been criticized on social media and Democratic political circles for his views that many called misogynistic. Now, amid the backlash, Epstein, who was a lecturer at the Northwestern University, Chicago, has his profile removed from the university website. Northwestern University said Epstein was never a "tenured professor" and had not given a lecture at the university since 2002. "While we firmly support academic freedom and freedom of expression, we do not agree with Mr. Epstein's opinion and believe the designation of doctor is well deserved by anyone who has earned a Ph.D., an Ed.D. or an M.D.," the university said in a statement, adding that the university strongly disagreed with "Epstein's misogynistic views."

 

Controversial Op-Ed Epstein through his article expressed dismay at first lady elect Dr Jill Biden's usage of her doctorate title. The soon-to-be first lady has a doctorate in Education from the University of Delaware but Epstein believed other than a doctor in medicine or a doctorate in science, no one should use the title. "Any chance you might drop the 'Dr' before your name? 'Dr Jill Biden' sounds and feels fraudulent, not to say a touch comic," Epstein wrote. "A wise man once said that no one should call himself 'Dr' unless he has delivered a child. Think about it, Dr Jill, and forthwith drop the doc." Epstein said that PhD once had prestige but the value of it had diminished due to the "erosion of seriousness and the relaxation of standards in university education." Furthermore, he said Dr Biden's dissertation on "Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs" was unpromising and undeserving of a doctorate. "As for your Ed.D., Madame First Lady, hard-earned though it may have been, please consider stowing it, at least in public, at least for now. Forget the small thrill of being Dr. Jill, and settle for the larger thrill of living for the next four years in the best public housing in the world as First Lady Jill Biden," he concluded.

 

Backlash on Social Media While Epstein is entitled to his opinion, his tone in the op-ed or rather rhetoric has been the problem. It was misogynistic, to say the least, according to thousands of netizens, who lashed out at WSJ and Epstein. Many medical doctors and PhD holders came out in support of the next first lady, criticizing Epstein. While not many with PhDs use Dr before the name, it has been left up to the individuals. However, Epstein should note that even though the percentage of doctorate holders has doubled since 2000 in the U.S., only 4.5 million Americans have such a degree — about 1.4 percent of the total American population. Dr Jill is one of them. Hence, using a doctorate other than a doctor and scientist should not be seen as a "show off". Kate Bedingfield, President-elect Joe Biden's communications director, later in a tweet said Epstein's op-ed was "patronizing, sexist, elitist drivel." "Dr B earned a doctorate in education, so we call her Doctor. The title Mr Epstein has earned here is perhaps not fit for mixed company," she said. However, this is not the first time Epstein has been embroiled in controversy. In 1970, his article for Harper's Magazine drew criticism for its perceived homophobia. The article titled, "Homo/Hetero: The Struggle for Sexual Identity" used the N-word to describe homosexual people while he said that he would wish homosexuality off the face of the earth if he had the power to do so. "There is much my four sons can do in their lives that might cause me anguish, that might outrage me, that might make me ashamed of them and of myself as their father. Nothing they could ever do would make me sadder than if any of them were to become homosexual. For then I should know them condemned to a state of permanent niggerdom among men, their lives, whatever adjustment they might make to their condition, to be lived out as part of the pain of the earth," he wrote in his article.

https://www.ibtimes.sg/northwestern-university-removes-joseph-epstein-after-wsj-op-ed-dr-jill-biden-54155

https://twitter.com/davidgura/status/1337980412065361927

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20407226/bidens-dissertation.pdf

Anonymous ID: eaa5e0 Dec. 18, 2020, 2:12 p.m. No.12083658   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3687 >>3766 >>3786 >>3826 >>3899 >>3911

Texas Hospital Administers a COVID-19 Vaccine on Video. There's Just One Glaring Problem…

 

This is rather inexcusable. The University Medical Center in El Paso, Texas, decided to televise COVID-19 vaccines for staff members. I am sure the leaders’ intentions were good. Showing medical workers taking the vaccine helps to increase confidence in the process and may encourage those hesitant to receive it. However, if you watch this video of this vaccination, the syringe is clearly empty. The black plunger is fully depressed when the person administering it correctly pulls back on it. The vaccine is an intramuscular, or “IM,” injection. When you give someone an IM injection, you pull back slightly to ensure you have not mistakenly entered a blood vessel. According to the FDA’s Emergency Use fact sheet for the Pfizer vaccine, administrators should dilute 0.3 ml of vaccine in 1.8 ml of normal saline, then withdraw 0.3 ml of the diluted vaccine to give a dose. The syringe in the video appears to be a 1-ml syringe, which means the plunger’s black bottom should be a third of the way up when the professional makes the injection, and then the professional should back up the syringe halfway to ensure the needle does not stick in a blood vessel. The health care worker in the video clearly did not do this. Once this video went viral on social media, the hospital said this nurse received another injection of the vaccine. “After numerous reports emerged on social media claiming one of the five nurses receiving a vaccination on Tuesday did not receive a full dose of vaccine, we want to remove any doubt raised that he was not fully vaccinated and further strengthen confidence in the vaccination process,” UMC said in a statement to KTSM. “The nurse in question today was vaccinated again. UMC has confirmed with the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that re-vaccinating the nurse will not cause adverse effects. The nurse will need to return after three weeks to receive his second dose.”

 

However, given some people’s skepticism about the vaccine, watching a non-dose given on live TV is hardly helpful. Some medical professionals in the U.K. have warned that people with anaphylactic allergies that cause shortness of breath should not take the vaccine after two hospital staff members experienced reactions. The COVID-19 vaccine uses new technology. The vaccine uses mRNA to innoculate people, rather than a weakened form of the virus, which other vaccines use. Some observers are concerned that, given the short trial period, researchers may not have identified long-term effects. Further, health experts and Pfizer’s chairman have both said that getting the vaccine does not change the need for people to take precautions to slow the spread of the virus. While they are confident that you are not likely to have a severe illness from COVID-19 once you are vaccinated, masks, social distancing, and other precautions will still be required. They will not say that the vaccine prevents you from transmitting COVID-19. This is not the case with any other vaccine ever produced, so some young, healthy people ask, what is the point of even taking the shot? You are certainly going to have some people who are more skeptical now. The video of an empty syringe on live television raises a serious question: Why did it happen? The person giving the injection knew the syringe was empty as soon as he pulled back on it. Very strange indeed and not helpful at all.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/stacey-lennox/2020/12/17/texas-hospital-administers-a-covid-19-vaccine-on-video-theres-just-one-glaring-problem-n1217133

https://twitter.com/HotepJesus/status/1339569461137977345

Anonymous ID: eaa5e0 Dec. 18, 2020, 2:31 p.m. No.12083863   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3889 >>3899

>>12083644

 

Guardians of Intelligence

 

308th Military Intelligence Battalion

https://history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/mi/0308mibn.htm

https://history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/mi/defaultMI.htm