"There is no 'QAnon'" - Q
MOS
As if what you prefer to be posted first is the 'standard'.
Please explain how posting a Q drop, and quoting a statement from Q in the drop, constitutes 'inauthentic' anon.
Kek, you are having a rough time coping in the digital battlefield.
Kek, shill is upset fellow shill spurged after I posted a Q drop.
>You mean right below
No, I mean I posted a Q drop and then it was attacked by 'anons' spurging accusations…TRIGGERED BY A Q DROP = INSTA-SHILL.
Try harder.
Dinah Shore
Kek, congrats to the Anon who created that meme. It's definitely over the target given how shills are desperately trying to ruin it.
Here, cope some more.
"There is no 'QAnon'" - Q
>predict non-authentic anons attacking
Kek, you must have missed the part where my initial post of a Q drop was attacked by the very same anons you're claiming were attacked by 'inauthentic anons'.
Lease explain how anons who post Q drops are 'inauthentic anons' while anons who attack anons who post Q drops are 'predicting inauthentic anon attacks'?
Authentic anons will wait.
Cue jeopardy theme.
Kek!
Here's more cope for you to again attack, because, you know, 'inauthentic anons' are those who post Q drops that get attacked.
Kekekekekekekekekekek
These evil sons of bitches are using what is no worse than the flu as an excuse to impoverish the citizenry.
>Intentionally misinterpret
Lease explain how posting an image of a Q drop, and citing one quote from that Q drop, can by any reasonable rational standard ever constitute 'intentional misinterpretation'.
>He had you guys right out of the gate.
Please explain how my posting a Q drop, which was then followed by attacks from 'Anons' who then claimed victimhood, constitutes 'being had right out of the gate'.
>Q was VERY clear when he demanded the board be returned to its original form.
Please provide the proof that Q was referring to a file image, and not the structure of baking and notables, given that Q did mention "structure".
Please also explain why you are unable to cope with this:
"There is no 'QAnon'" - Q
Kek, shill is coping so badly shill is now defacing and slandering Q drops.
Here's more cope:
Thanks for conceding the argument. Truth is better isn't it.
Even the brits need some love every now and then.
Dec 18, 2020: The day when the shill night shift just gave up and started to slander Q drops because they ran out of ideas.
Sad!
Death Star belly wretchen gretchen deserves to be snubbed.
Bleggh, I wouldn't drink that cuck Josh Rake's donkey piss if it was the last beer on Earth.
It's not cringe until you explain how you concluded CM 'is acting like he doesn't now wtf is going on'.
You we talking about a fake photo?
Maybe you should start talking about beers.
She can be in prison and you can have conjugal visits in your basement with that fake photo.
Durham 'true' start was Oct 28, 2017.
Proof:
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/john-h-durham-sworn-united-states-attorney
No you don't, you only want to disarm and dissuade the righteous anger justifiably targeted against that psychotic evil criminal.
Someone trying desperately to keep the fake news' fake 'QAnon' straw man dead horse alive and relevant.
It's why that drop is attacked, why the shills lose their shit, why the shills seethe over it.
The fake news NEEDS an invented target to attack because they can't refute Q.
2+2=4