Got notabled as "the future of warfare"
Actually, gay video tbpfh.
If this is indicative of America's 4 stars. Ummm… I don't know how to tell you this….
He's regurgitating fox news talking points about geopolitics, at a minimum.
It's a cleft Jim.
Got notabled as "the future of warfare"
Actually, gay video tbpfh.
If this is indicative of America's 4 stars. Ummm… I don't know how to tell you this….
He's regurgitating fox news talking points about geopolitics, at a minimum.
It's a cleft Jim.
>the ability to thrive in ambiguity and chaos
That's no different from war ever though. The siege of vicksburg is given as an example, and grant diverting the river to remove their water source. This is just basic generalling.
This is just adding a matrix screenshot to basic generalling
"we shoot a missile through the air and shoot a ship that's multi-domain" - this is not a Big Idea.
I've been to management presentations where they'll make you think their shit is the greatest shit since ever. And that's what this is. The latest management guru hype.
And cleft.
Sure. Yes there is ambiguity and chaos. But I don't see how that's new in warfare, and there is nothing new in that video, in terms of ideas.
The fact that it's presented like "we have to do it or we might lose someday". Do what? Nothing is presented in that video that's a new idea to warfare. Either they're not really saying what the idea is, or we have a bunch of managers hepped up on the latest management guru stuff.
He also spouts a lot of fox news geopolitics. Which should honestly be a concern.
He IS the human element. He has been the SUBJECT of a media warfare campaign. He shows signs of having been COOPTED by a media campaign.
He's right that the human element is important. And he IS it.
>Hes pushing the vaccines harder than anyone.
Then you must not have seen the GA rally "a lot of you are already immune".
>>12088552 (me)
The ONLY vaguely new idea presented is "phase 0 warfare" which sort of means deception on social media prior to an actual campaign.
OK I guess that's vaguely a new idea. Would that be like Hillary telling us that a youtube video caused the US ambassador to be murdered? Or other such bullshit that they feed us? Doesn't sound too great.
How about being RIGHT, instead of figuring out how to be WRONG and appearing to be right.