>Who the fuck is "CJ"?
You must be because its who Q was talking to directly. You know, just below what you are trying to hold up as proof of anything.
>Who the fuck is "CJ"?
You must be because its who Q was talking to directly. You know, just below what you are trying to hold up as proof of anything.
>Hahaha, you're seething so bad you're creating an anxiety induced fiction story to cope.
>Cope.
8th line from the bottom there C.J.. Reading comprehension is not your strong suit is it?
>Hahaha, your anxiety is so acute that you take what Q mentioned about a "CJ" and create a fiction story of Anons as your only way to 'counter' the intolerable truth that there is no 'QAnon'.
>Cope.
So, C.J. as you are actually called out in that post along with it being pointed out how you and other anons are not actually anons, but infiltrators, how to do convince anons now how you are on their side after Q reposted your tweet? I'd make a fancy map with arrows and graphics and shit, but I doubt you could follow that any better than you can sentence structure.