sciencefiction theme:
supernovae are all created at the end of a civilization that blows it self up and are not natural.
Weirdest headline I found about Adam?
humm?
well there was this other congressman who was indighted? and came out as . . .
and he . . . was said to have coerced someone else to donate to AK.
that shows up in a wikipedia article.
whatelse: voted very handsome.
he's got a great look and if you are attracted to muscular military men, he kind of has it all (that is no reason to vote for someone).
however he also has no sense of 'sometimes you should have a shower and rst first' because sometimes he looks like he battled through hell for a day or two.
Also weird article about him . . . having odd foreign women think that he's been in contact with them and wants to marry him (he was a 'catch') for a quite a while, recently married.
Whatelse? some say he served only 7 years.
maybe they don't know that Adam is still in The Guard.
and that is rather commendible.
so I'm on the same page as saying what I used to say about JPOS: do we know all of Adam's details. Can we keep an open mind?
JPOS is firmly in the camp of 'the election was stolen'
Adam, well, he's a skeptic.
and that Russia Russia Russia thing he did, well that's just stupid.
Christian doctrine doesn't say people are evil
they might do evil.
they are not, themselves, evil
shill fail
repetitive operation of AI
newest bullshit troll of falsity.
you're not Q.
you were supposed to post a trip and be Q and make be a fool, I tell ya, a fool.
I'd be OK with that if you were really Q.
but you're not Q.
there is that time that someone, and I suspect who it is based up on other info (an anon that was . . . ) anyway
that anon called Q a : . . . . . . ..
and then Q posted as Q to shut him up (not in a mean way).
It was hillarious.
FYI for the 'men are evil' shill:
not being good does not mean you are evil
men can be unclean or sinful
if they were evil they would not be redeemable.
they are redeemable.
It had to happen on a day.
There are holy days in all societies from back then.
so they were supposed to hold it on a day when there were no other holidays?
how could they do that?
So you claim it was 'Saturnallia' but the truth is rather different as per digs I've done.
there was a different diety who was very popular and there were held slaughters of bulls in caves and tunnels . . .
it wasn't about Saturn.
the whole 'it was a Pagan Holiday' thing is bogus.
It was a holiday. It kept being a Holiday.
The same people decided to not do the old stuff and start with the new.
what do you suggest that they should have done?
pretend like it wasn't holiday time?
this year we see what happens when people try to pull that.
it doesn't work.
the families are going to want to gather and give gifts.
PS: pagans make great Christians once they learn the Truth.
Jews who believe that everyone hates them and then falsely accuse others are fearful.
I understand that.
someoen in the ADL who should know better pretends that anyone who disagrees with their censorship is a NAZI, that is a bit harsh for me to deal with.
Clearly some Jews are controlled by extreame fear, and evne though seemingly OK most of the time can be triggered into a hateful accusatory rage . . . that is uncalled for and often misdirected.
Those Jews do present a problem.
the Jews that adhere to the unspoken neptism that we all know is real (they know it too) are a serious problem and destroy businesses and industry.
I didnt' say it was. I pointed out obvious and well known by everyone, issues about modern jews in the west who run a lot fowl cons.
did I say 'all'?
no
did I say that Jews are bad?
no
my point: the obviousness is too obvious.
saying 'it's not the Jews doesn't free people from the need for Jews to understand: they let their pitbulls loose on the rest of us and allow EXTREME NEPOTISM in Industry and commerce.
it's obvious.
and as many times as they are warned they don't fix it.
is it hateful for me to say that thus they bring it on their own kind when they do this stuff?
not even.
but how dare I, right?
shut up sheep? is that what you want to ell me?
your dangerous aposty needs noting.
you are a snake and try to confuse.
no one should take your commentaries to heart.
snake who falsifies the scripture with fake interpretations saying the opposite.
now you show yourself for what you are
you are a putdown shill
what happened? Did I touch a nerve?
but you don't try to be good, so why should I expect you to actually behave the way you claim to be ?
if I were doing bad, you'd amonish me not just throw me under the bus.
and in fact, I can see through you so that means I understand it pretty well, well enough to know that you a spouter of poison ideas, 98 % sugar and 2 % poison (enough to kill ya?)
be gone.
go read your scriptures.
you fail to understand .