>Is Supreme Court approval required for POTUS to declare martial law?
from the no-child-left-behind generation, are ya?
>I'm probably older than you are. I had read something earlier that said he had to and I questioned that.
i'm 69. class of '69. can you trump that? even if you can't, you proly shoulda known better, fren. but it's all good.
>time to cross the rubicon
>save the republic or perish
AKSHULLY… the war that ensued ENDED the republic permanently, and established the roman EMPIRE.
>Bolton, one of the dumbest people in Washington
bolton wasn't too stoopid to line his own pockets.
>Julius Caesar was never emperor
be that as it may, the republic ended as a direct result of caesar's decision to cross the rubicon.
>But, why are you so defensive? Did you just dox yourself?
sorry anon, you took that completely the wrong way. happens with text msgs. dox me all you want. been on "their" shit list since the vietnam war days. antiwar demonstrator and all that…
which is EXACTLY what one would EXPECT him to say as he reaches under the desk to press the button that releases the hounds.
you probly suck at chess AND poker, huh?
just to be clear, we (antiwar protesters) NEVER had anything against the GIs (who were mostly drafted in my day), and all the stories about antiwar protesters spitting on returning vets was bullshit. if there were spitters, they were gov't plants w/ a camera conveniently nearby. we were on the side of the GIs, trying to get them home alive. had plenty of relatives and friends who got sucked in. total respect for the grunts. it was the politicians and profiteers we were after.
as another anon pointed out martial law is NOT required to use mil to arrest foreign combatants, here OR abroad.
this is STILL classic misdirection.
>it is ok to hope for that, but one should be prepared for the opposite
there IS NO preparation for the opposite. surrender w/o a struggle. live to fight another day.