Anonymous ID: fad3a6 Dec. 20, 2020, 2:24 a.m. No.12102422   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2441 >>2492 >>2650 >>2659 >>2674 >>2697 >>2702 >>2760 >>2767 >>2793 >>2871 >>2930 >>2967 >>3006 >>3045 >>3068 >>3116 >>3172 >>3180

somehow missed, not in qresear.ch yet.

 

WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has A ‘Problem’

December 17, 2020

 

In a statement released on December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally owned up to what 100,000’s of doctors and medical professionals have been saying for months: the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 is a hit and miss process with way too many false positives.

 

This WHO-admitted “Problem” comes in the wake of international lawsuits exposing the incompetence and malfeasance of public health officials and policymakers for reliance on a diagnostic test not fit for purpose.

 

This World Health Organization admission is that the crux of the “problem” is a wholly arbitrary cycling process which “means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.” [emphasis added]

 

The UN body is now clearly looking to distance itself from the fatally flawed test as a growing number of lawsuits are processing through the courts exposing the insanity of relying on a test that even the inventor, Professor Kary B. Mullis said was never designed to diagnose diseases. [1]

 

https://principia-scientific.com/who-finally-admits-covid19-pcr-test-has-a-problem/

Anonymous ID: fad3a6 Dec. 20, 2020, 2:29 a.m. No.12102441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2492 >>2650 >>2659 >>2674 >>2697 >>2760 >>2767 >>2793 >>2840 >>2871 >>2930 >>2967 >>3006 >>3045 >>3068 >>3116 >>3172 >>3180

>>12102422

>WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has A ‘Problem’

SO:

the consensus - even among the DS - seems to be that we are now shutting down the ENTIRE PLANET to treat a malady that

  1. uses a test which is completely unreliable

  2. can be easily and effectively treated by HCQ and Ivermectin (see Oct stmt by the AMA, which reversed their anti-treatment stance)

  3. has a 99%+ survival rate.

 

what's wrong with this picture???

Anonymous ID: fad3a6 Dec. 20, 2020, 3:33 a.m. No.12102720   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2760 >>2772 >>2793 >>2871 >>2930 >>2967 >>3006 >>3045 >>3068 >>3073 >>3116 >>3180

>>12102566

Captured on twatter: Robt Kennedy's discussion of potentially dire effects from Covid19 vaxxes, due to Pathogenic Priming - where the vaccine appears to have triggered a robust immune response after administered but when the person encounters the actual virus in real life, he (for unknown reasons) is very badly affected (much worse than unvaxxed people).

https://twitter.com/lyne_ian/status/1335197467143356416

Below is the article on which the vid is based.

 

Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Shows Alarming Evidence of Pathogenic Priming in Older Adults

By James Lyons-Weiler, PhD & Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

12-10-2020

 

In the development of vaccines against coronaviruses like SARS-COV-1 and MERS in the early 2000’s, researchers found evidence of a serious problem. Teams of U.S. and foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs.

 

This issue is well known. Early in the COVID-19 scenario, Dr. Peter Hotez, of Baylor College of Medicine, testified before Congress about the dangers of accelerating coronavirus vaccine development, saying “(The) unique safety problem of coronavirus vaccines” was discovered 50 years ago while developing the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine.”

 

He went to register that this “‘paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon’ means vaccinated people may still develop the disease, get sicker and die.”….

 

Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1950s. The vaccines not only failed to prevent infection; 80% of the children infected required hospitalization, and two children challenged with the RSV died (see Openshaw, 2005). In April of 2020, Hotez told CNN, “If there is immune enhancement in animals, that’s a showstopper.”

 

[Enhanced immune response = pathogenic priming]

 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/

 

More Sauce:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/

Allo-priming as a universal anti-viral vaccine: protecting elderly

https://cmr.asm.org/content/18/3/541

 

There are additional cites in the article.