>>12110960

Well, if it is a helper anon with daily briefings with POTUS, I can tell you that written communications is not their forte'.

The message above is a bit repetitive and also contradictory.

Example: "Q will not post here again, at least not for a while." (Awhile should be one word, btw, but that's minor.) Then again: "Once we wind down you will not hear from Q again."

So…

We will not hear from Q ever again?

Or we will not hear from Q for awhile?

Or is it only once they wind down that Q will not post again?

Also there is not truly anything here that we don't already know.

Still, I screencapped it myself for archiving purposes.

>>12111280

>Could we be getting ready to see a reveal / unraveling of FF attacks like PA103 and 911?

I'd say that's a stretch, but hope springs eternal.

>>12111193

That ain't HillDawg. In fact, I have not seen the real Hillary going on several years now.