>>12114392

Q says "in hospital"

There is no 'a' added.

Therefore, I would search through the various meanings/uses of hospital to derive alternative ideas of what Q could mean by that statement.

I am the type of person who looks as much at what Q does not say in statements as much as what Q does say. Q's statements are deliberately structured to lead people into assuming what is being said. Questions following each other are assumed to be related or hinting at the 'correct' answer to the question above. While this 'lead' meaning is intentional and necessary to what Q's aims are - it is not necessarily the way to get useful information from a Q post.

>>12114461

Fuck around and find out. Vid related. You Capellans are nothing if not predictable.

>>12114460

Q is going to use what you understand. Q is not here to vindicate your biases or views. That is not the purpose of Q. Q's mission has always been to promote and create a specific movement and conversation. That has been essential for creating the disinformation necessary to provoke specific actions and to built popular conversation about topics once considered tabboo and unacceptable. The overton window has been shifted in that regard and while the caste of "professionals" are still going to cling to the world of prim and proper conduct as they understand - the conversation on the ground and among many "normies" even includes basic concerns and awareness about human trafficking among us and the insanity of our politicians. "The simulation is broken."

Q is not lying to you, but for many people, you can only explain to them in terms and concepts they understand or accept. It saves a lot of time.

>>12114472

…. And your shill script just jumped the shark.

While I'll hold to my oath, it has far more to do with preventing a known intelligence operative of the Chinese from seating the Presidency than it does some kind of allegiance to Trump.

I like the guy and will go to bat alongside him if need be - but I follow something higher.

>>12114508

My error, then. For some reason I recall that being absent from the post. Looking at archives I see one mention of "a" hospital and one mention of "the" hospital.

>>12114560

There are two sides to this coin. First, if games were just a delay away from perfection, then Duke Nukem Forever would have been spectacular. All was clearly not well at the studio and that much was obvious. I blame corporate for being soul sucking demons hellbent on federal reserve points.

The other side of that coin is that glitchy or clunky games have always been a part of gaming history and it isn't glitches that necessarily destroy a game or else Elder Scrolls and Fallout wouldn't be a thing. Those engines are held together with desperate python script and text files. Figuratively speaking. But people have fun with them.

The developers were still trying to find their fun loop in the game, I think - and sometimes that just takes longer than the investors are willing to hold out for.