>>12122869 (PB)
Isaiah is great reading and very relevant divine prophecy.
But I think the path to truth is always a more complex route of backroads that requires asking more demanding questions:
Is the believer who rejects the discovery of petroleum more faithful to God? The Amish think so. So do we return to the horse and buggy? What dark magick is the internal combustion engine, after all?
Today, most of us devout to God don't reject the discoveries of His universe, though we would question whether they're used for light or dark.
And yet is the supernatural not also in the realm of science in that it is an exploration of the (unseen) universe, like quarks and bosons? The sorcerers who would use these supernatural (super-scientific) discoveries to impose their own will (not God's) through the invocation of evil spirits are obviously condemned by scripture for good reason.
But what (quantum) discovery or (ancient) revelation do we reject because the corrupt have used such insights into God's universe for their own ends, while the very same discovery in the hands of the True Christian can be used to shape a world not for own individual desires but to accomplish God's loving Plan? To further the will of God by elaborating on the "science of prayer" while never once turning to the devil and fallen angels. God commands them for His design, and we should submit to that design. Shouldn't we use our discoveries in all fields to save the world, rather than feather our own individual nest at the expense of others the way the evil astrologers and witches do (I'm lookin' at you Nancy).