Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 21, 2020, 5:26 p.m. No.12123711   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I like where this is going, I’ll join. Digging up on ole skippy is always a good time. Give me a few hours, I’ll focus on connections 2-3 degrees deeper than pedosta himself.

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 22, 2020, 5:25 a.m. No.12130929   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1140 >>2312

Got a new post from skippy last night, digging now. I love how he locks who can reply to his tweets, gives us more insight into the ones he approves to reply.

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 22, 2020, 5:49 a.m. No.12131140   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12130929

More podesta digs

 

Okay, I'm gonna end up digging from multiple sides here, but here's a start. We know he's obsessed with numbers, so when I saw he posted at exactly 6:00 PM central on 12/21/2020, that prompted me to start there.

Spent some time studying the date/time he tweets and the number of RTs, Quote Tweets, and Likes that he permits (don't forget he locks who can comment on his tweets, probably cuz he would get blasted by anons 24x7, but he does seem to allow some through, strangely enough).

 

  1. https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/1341171603149864962

Posted @ 6PM on 12/21 (1+2+2+1 = 6)

10 RTs, 8QTs, 49Likes, 10+8+49 = 67 = 13

  1. https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/1339654748010672128

Posted @ 1:32PM (1+3+2 = 6) on 12/17 = 11

42 RTs, 19QTs, 256 likes = 317 = 11

  1. https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/1339206624964120576

Posted @ 7:51AM (7+5+1 = 13)

  1. https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/1338879297784864771

Posted @ 10:11 AM (1+1+1=3) on 12/15 (1+2 = 3, 1+5 = 6, = 9)

3 RTs, 6QTs, 36Likes

This post seems to be important based on these stupid numbers, suggest digging into further.

  1. https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/1338868934779367427

Posted @ 9:30 AM, on 12/15 (9, 3, 3, 6)… you get the point by now

7 RTs, 17QTs, 216Likes = 7+17+216 = 240 = 6

this is the tweet where he seems to tag his boy @eroston who also seems to talk in code.

 

refilling coffee and hitting this again from another angle later today.

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 22, 2020, 6:20 a.m. No.12131410   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1900

More sketchy tweets from the @eroston character:

 

Start with the weird pedosta endorsement of this guy and then dig further into his past tweets, we start to see a recurring theme.

 

Dig on some of his tweets containing "eat": https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3Aeroston%20%22eat%22&src=typed_query&f=live

 

see pics.

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 22, 2020, 7:07 a.m. No.12131900   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1963 >>2177 >>2295 >>8259

>>12131410

guise, another breakthrough

 

I speculated that this tweet was using some sort of steganography: https://twitter.com/eroston/status/1338337974640107520

 

Also, note that the date he listed in the text is 11/1/19, think mirror (9/11?), and of course tags NY.

 

that tweet was posted on 12/13/20, well look what he tweets on 12/17: https://twitter.com/eroston/status/1339652776289288194

"Is this an intelligence agency steganographic access code key"

 

Guise, I think this dude is a comms arm for pedosta

 

look at other tweets containing "code"

 

Here's an interesting timeline to consider:

 

12/13/20 @ 10:20 PM - Roston tweets stego pic of sky with a tag of NY on 11/1/19 (think mirror)

Note: his twitter banner is the same pic

12/15/20 @ 7:29 AM - Roston tweets a pic of pedosta

12/15/20 @ 9:30 AM - Pedosta endorses (7 RTs, 17QTs, 216 Likes)

12/15/20 @ 9:48 AM - Roston replies, confirms handoff

12/17/20 @ 1:24 PM - Roston replies to @KendraWrites who tweeted "Is it snowing in boston?", asking "Is this an intelligence agency steganographic access code key"

 

I'd bet that random blue sky photo has comms in it, and the key is in that 12/17 @ 1:24 PM tweet, perhaps even "Is it snowing in boston?" MOAR DIGS NEEDED

 

don't forget this one: https://twitter.com/eroston/status/1341088358014083073

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 22, 2020, 7:28 a.m. No.12132177   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2850

>>12131900

 

Add another entry to that timeline I built.

 

12/18/20 @ 8:33 PM confusing tweet with 1 comment: "Evergreen tweet" -https://twitter.com/eroston/status/1340123092023189504

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 22, 2020, 8:34 a.m. No.12132913   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12132850

good thinking, not seeing the connection with killary's tweets on the 18th, perhaps the roston tweet was FOR her or FROM her, and Jessica Green was used for confirmation?

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 23, 2020, 5:17 a.m. No.12144707   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Can we get some more eyes on Ann O'Leary? Just noticed that she got a shout out from Killary, Pedosta and Newsom all within the last 2 days. Seems like there has to be more here than what's on the surface in her tweets:

 

@Ann_OLeary - https://twitter.com/Ann_OLeary

Anonymous ID: 43aff3 Dec. 28, 2020, 7:53 a.m. No.12209366   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I'm back at it, I can't get over this guy for some reason, there has to be more to his tweets than meets the eye. Spend 15 minutes and just read his tweets and his conversations, they are too random to be normal. Look at the tweets he likes too.

 

https://twitter.com/eroston/with_replies

 

Weird that pedosta endorses this guy, seems to me like the majority of this guys' tweets are all code, wonder if he is tweeting keys to some steganographic images or something.