Ok, the first time he blurted this out,

the DOJ made a statement clarifying

it.

Now, he's just basically saying that

what he said back then WAS, IN FACT,

FACT.

Now WTF is he thinking to be saying

something THAT IS SO BLATANTLY

FALSE to anybody and everybody

that's been paying attention to

ALL THE EVIDENCE that as been

BROADCAST ONLINE from the

get go?

Help me out here.

I'm so f*cking confused with this guy.

I was TEAM B2 BOMBER from the

very beginning, and now, he's turning

out to be ANOTHER F'IN TURNCOAT?

WTFFFFFFFF!

>>12127345

This has been out for a while now.

Anybody able to PULL ANYTHING of

kun worthiness from it?

>>12127358

OBVIOUSLY, you COMPREHEND

a LOT MORE than I, so maybe you can

MANSPLAIN the move at play here

that can SHED SOME LIGHT on

WHY he was KEPT IN HIS POSITION

OF POWER for as long as he has.

There's about 150 opportunities left

in this bread to do so.

I'll wait.

>>12127400

Now THIS is a reply WORTHY OF NOTE

and filled with SUBSTANCE that helps

those of us who use this board to engage

in INTELLIGENT DISCOURSE, helping

each other NAVIGATE through the CONFUSION

of CONFLICTING REVELATIONS being

played out in the media.

Thank you, patriot.

o7