The procedures of mass-gassing as attested to by witnesses during their interrogation before various courts of law, as cited in judicial rulings, and as described in scientific and literary publications, in any building of Auschwitz whatsoever, are inconsistent with documentary evidence, technical necessities, and natural scientific law.”
— Germar Rudolf The Chemistry of Auschwitz, p. 278
“Cyanide poisoning leaves a bright pink corpse and so does carbon-monoxide poisoning (allegedly, ‘one-third of the Holocaust’) and not one single pink corpse was ever recorded in the German labour-camps of WW2”
— Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom
“Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers… or seek to disprove the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.”
— ‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’ at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000
“One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”
— “34 reputable historians” published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
“For the scientific historian a witness statement does not represent real history. It is an object of history. A witness statement counts for little, many witnesses’ statements count for no more, if there is no solid document to support them. One could say without much exaggeration, the principle of scientific historiography is, No paper(s), no proven facts.”
….
“It is necessary to recognize that the lack of traces involves the inability to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.”
— French historian Jacques Baynac, Faute de documents probants sur les chambres à gaz, les historiens ésquivent le débat, in: Le Nouveau Quotidien (Lousanne), 3 September 1996, p. 14 An Orthodox Historian Finally Acknowledges: There is No Evidence for Nazi Gas Chambers
“Some claim that there are plenty of proofs, testimonies, and confessions as to the existence and the functioning of the gas chambers. They should find it all the easier to describe this extraordinary weapon. Please spare me words and theories. Give me a material description of what is supposed to be a material reality. This is my challenge: “you have no photo, show me or draw me a Nazi gas chamber!”
— Professor Robert Faurisson My Challenge
“Mass human cyanide gas chambers have never existed in human history.” The affirmation here is that normal hygiene technology functioned in an ordinary, normal manner in the German labour camps: that is the core essence of what is today meant by “Holocaust denial.”
— Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality
“The three victor nations, Russia, America and Britain, collaborated together at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the post-war moral high ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two million tons of bombs. People were loath to believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American intelligence had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience. Only then, I suggest, does it start to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was the original WMD hoax.”
— Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality
“Only if the victor’s war propaganda found entry into the history books of the vanquished and is believed by the following generation, then the re-education can be considered as really successful.”
— Chief editor of the New York World, Walter Lippmann
“The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?”
— John Weir, The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust
“If the Holocaust were unimportant, we wouldn’t have around 20 countries on this planet outlawing its critical investigation. In fact, this is the only historical topic that is regulated by penal law. This is proof for the fact that the powers that be consider this topic to be the most important issue to keep under their strict control. Those censoring, suppressing powers are the real criminals—not the historical dissidents they send to prison.”
— Germar Rudolf, Logic and Reason Can and Will Destroy the Holocaust Establishment
“The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.”
— Robert Faurisson, The revisionists’ total victory on the historical and scientific level
https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/
Old Newspaper Read's Six million Jews Died in 1915 1938 Before Hitler was in power
>Do you hate niggers and jews?
>CHINK
>Jooz
>Jew hating
>Jew hating