People would have to stream audio of their own voice only. The design of the microphone in view is copyrighted, the design of the desk in front of you might be copyrighted, the design of the clothes on your body, aren't they considered copyrighted in a sense?
So they are actually killing "fair use", or does the "fair use" have jurisdiction over the level of law they are trying to pass?
fair use is in the copyright act
https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html
It was a check for New York City as a help for 911 damages. It was not a personal check for Rudy FFS
Why are 28 of 32 notables from the SAME FUCKING ID?
Anime baker is controlling the narrative don't you see? This isBULLSHIT
same thing with you every fucking time. Either you do this, or you fill the notables with JQ spam bullshit (just look at #15484 notables). Or both. If anyone is glowing here it is you.
You are not Anon. You are not a patriot. You have an agenda which is not in line with the purpose of this place and Anons know it. Anons know.
That's weird, you almost convince people that you are more than one person agreeing with each other when you are actually one person with several devices open.
Have any information to counter the actual claims of my posts?