Baker hates anons and Q.. He just wants Qresearch to look as bad as he can make it.. That way he can claim he's the victim.
Baker hates anons and Q.. He just wants Qresearch to look as bad as he can make it.. That way he can claim he's the victim.
>>>12129901
>
>You mean this image?
>
>>pic related
>
>Fuck off, I'm collecting notes now. No time to talk to you shitlords.
Aren't you as sweet as the Devil himself..NICE Description you got going there.. what garbage!
When you post garbage I will reply to you! Like it or NOT. You behave.. You won't see me.. Post garbage you will get garbage!
YOU LABELED the WRONG BREAD#
We have 2 breads #
Q Research General #15486: Knots Ties and Lies Edition
Q Research General #15486: DayShift Rock and Roll Edition
But I'm sure it was all innocent Right??
You need to change the Number of this bread!.. Do you have BO credentials? Isn't this a BO function?
Simplest of terms, designed to censor, drive people away from the use of videos as a forum for information. All this from those who are supposed to follow the constitution. Betting many of them never read one page of it. This might be a great intro into changing the way things are done in Washington, part of the vetting process.. require a test on the constitution, if they can't pass that test, how could they possibly vote on laws for the governed.
Absolutely..6000 pages is beyond anyone's tolerance for acceptable, need a year to read it.. and another year to digest it all.
No question, No moar lifetime appointments..Term limits for Legislature, Judges, etc. Media has gotten to monopolized with the big 6 ww..time for an end to that as well
Indeed.. Disgusting what they still try to do under our noses..they just don't care, most of them never did. Our tax dollars were nothing moar than a piggy bank that they could rob at will.
>I demand a written apology from each and every newfag.
>
>DEMAND I SAY!!
>
>Fucking normies and their judgements..
Did anons get apologies for the way they've been treated, for example.. Those notables YOU put back that shouldn't have been there in the first place? And YOU want an apology, incredible.
>>>12130321
>
>I can't read you fucking faggot or I would do it myself.
Strange how are you able to function here?
Yes.. realizing they are elected by their constituents if they can't pass this test, they would have no ability to weigh in or write laws effecting the governed. Consider it part of the vetting process, if the parties are serious about serious candidates then they'll make sure they can pass this before their ever put on the trail for a vote.
>>>12130344 (You)
>
>I'm not! Can't you figure that out on your own?
Sorry, its not obvious to me, since you are able to type and understand my statements enough to respond..so no I don't see the issue.
How about must be a US citizen to run for any office of government. Doesn't matter what branch/office or what level. So what I mean here is Federal State Local..