Anonymous ID: 0633d3 Dec. 22, 2020, 10:44 a.m. No.12134204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4240 >>4253

>>12133956

lawfag here

this is very misleading

the established law based on SCOTUS precedent is that only when congress adjourns "sine die" may recess appts. be made. Since die = without (day) of readjournement"

 

the reason for this scotus decision is the words of the constitution where POTUS may adjourn "to such a time" as he elects. The court has ruled this is NOT sine die (without a day) and is in fact the opposite

YES there have been comments and opinions to the contrary in published opinions but they are not binding - scotus would have to over rule its precedent that only when CONGRESS decides to adjourn sine die (without a specific date to reassemble) does the recess power apply

that is o doube why the article keeps mentioning some mysterious "help from friends ion congress" to accomplish this - whatever that may be is not specified by this writer or the court

watch who you follow

all resources are on the table

nothing held back

lies and secrets and BS abound as never before

will potus play the trump cards? does he have them? we will see (if no he deserves to lose)

Anonymous ID: 0633d3 Dec. 22, 2020, 10:51 a.m. No.12134274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4284

>>12134226

its copy pasta from prior spending bills

everything stays in

new stuff added

exactly the opposite of how it shud be done

all thrown out

everything new approved new

see why they dont do that? its work and accountability

Anonymous ID: 0633d3 Dec. 22, 2020, 10:55 a.m. No.12134316   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12134254

this latest congress faggotry and fuckery is another part of exposing them

that is why i believe potus will in fact veto BOTH bills and then make the big MOAB announcements

fuking epic