Anonymous ID: 3e9a1e Dec. 22, 2020, 10:46 a.m. No.12134224   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4264

>>12133962

 

>The clock Q spoke of was never the clown clock the 'clockfags' have been trying unsuccessfully to replace the real clock

Correct

 

>which is annual year deltas that Q confirmed on multiple occasions

Probably closer to accurate but also not complete

 

>>12133985

>Q kept telling us to "wind the clock," too. How do you "wind" the clockfag clock?

He said wind it with the markers, which is how you know they were off

It had more to do with confirming certain marked posts at a point in the future, and finding the time-delta relationship between them

 

> I think it's one of those things Q went back to the team and said, "Guise, this ain't working. Plan B."

This is almost certainly what happened.

They gave up on it and switched to more straightforward piecemeal comms that didnt rely on an overall system that we needed to discover

Which is a shame, because a few of us were trying pretty hard and I felt like I we got kinda close at times, just didn't have enough time, samples, or help.

Anonymous ID: 3e9a1e Dec. 22, 2020, 10:54 a.m. No.12134303   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12134264

Yes but what it's proponents never were smart enough to recognize is all they were doing was arranging thousands of data points in mod-60 columns

Then applying inconsistent and even unique at times algorithms to jump across the columns and find further biased connections

Laying out posts in that way is a valid tool amongst many to use

The problem is since that method can undoubtedly produce a "connection" no matter when or how you use it, they fell in love with the "results" and never moved on

To be honest though, anyone who couldn't understand what I just typed on their own probably wasn't high IQ enough to make real progress on the actual methods anyways

 

I was heavily active with markers and MAP work early on, and there were very few oldfags doing the same type of thing at an actually valuable level (maybe a dozen or two at absolute most)