Dominions use in states

Mostly used Verified Voting site for convenience and speed:

https://verifiedvoting.org/verifier/#mode/search/year/2020

(Here's another source for voting systems. Click on link under Machines/Link if available:

https://secureourvote.us/certifiedmachines/)

After looking at Iowa's mix of voting systems, it occurred to me that you don't need all the counties, precinct, cities, whatever, with Dominion. You program the machines to cheat a percentage and it's perhaps easier to tweak later on Dominion system. In a state wide election or for senate or congress, you may not even need Dominion in the largest population area- if you're just "adjusting" totals.

I don't really see how ANY election can be certified with any variant of Dominion in the mix. It's not that I trust ES&S, Hart InterCivic, or any of the others any more than Dominion. But most of the auditing seems to involve them right now.

One disturbing trend- online voting. Like with HAVA, voting for the disabled was used to usher in unverifiable voting. Yes, we need systems for those people. But online? How many ways can that be frauded?

Whether a state with Dominion went Dem or Rep isn't the issue. Keep in mind a game played when a party has a majority vote for a certain bill, unpopular in some areas- they can let a representative(s) vote against it for appearances. By the same token, they can "let" some Republicans in if they think they maintain the upper hand, for appearances. They'd probably prefer Rhinos.

These states/counties stood out:

Alaska- appears to be all Dominion unless hand counted

Arizona- one county using Dominion which had to be Maricopa

California- Dominion: Alameda, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Sacremento, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruiz, Shasta, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Sutter, Thama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Ventura, Yuba. (Los Angeles is Smartmatic but kinda, what's the difference?)

Connecticut- Premier/Diebold (Dominion) Calling the model AccuVote OS but assume Dominion is programming it now?

Illinois- has some. Of course, Cook County is one of the counties that has it.

Georgia- All Dominion

Louisiana- Dominion or Sequoia (Dominion)

Michigan- almost all Dominion

Nevada- Dominion all the way except for The City of Carson City? (ES&S) Because the county Carson City is in is Dominion

New Hampsire- Premier/Diebold (Dominion) where they have it. Some hand counted

New Mexico- Dominion

Vermont- Premier/Diebold (Dominion), some hand counted

Now how did Georgia, Alaska and New Mexico end up all Dominion? (Excluding the other variants) How did Cook County in Illinois get Dominion? Michigan almost all Dominion? Nevada all Dominion except The City of Carson City (ES&S)? The one county in Arizona, but it's Maricopa, using Dominion?

You'd think this was planned out. And states with those big buys of Dominion probably need some looking into- which I know people have already. That's a lot of money for a state budget.

27 of 50 states with that voting system in one variant or another. Yes, Dominion was on the way to dominance.

Oh, found one instance of this one:

Mississippi- Premier/Diebold (Dominion) majority. Hmmm…Internet Voting system is Scytil…wonder if that's related to anything?