I'm going to close the damper a bit on Byrne based on this Twat account:
EconChick/IntelChick
https://twitter.com/MikayesFiona/with_replies
Acct recommended by John Basham, and acct seems to be very pro Trump.TL;DR on Byrne from her is he is probably OK, but may not have enough background yet to see big picture. Questions Byrne claim that POTUS didn't know he was being ill-advised.
I do think, though, that Byrne's claim that Trump's legal team is looking at bigger gigs if Trump leaves office. Twat acct maintains, too, that legal never was the route because laws are too weak and it takes too long. Legal attempt was only to push evidence to public.
Re: meeting. Pence never mentioned. Heard Byrne say in an interview with Beanz that Trump kept asking, "What do I have to lose?", when criticized by his WH counsel.
So, does rumor of Pence not accepting electors by Dec 23 hold true, and WH counsel advise against it (rudely, according to Byrne) Pence going honey badger because it would actually work and blow up their new gigs?
Funny, too, to me, that Pelosi & Schumer rolled so quickly on POTUS demanding $2000 pro person. Congress got lit up with the $600 fuck you, I think, and now would be the best time for Pence to send them a bigger fuck you from POTUS and the American people. Congress overplayed their hand, and have to roll not only on the $2000 big, but money for illegals. as well. POTUS has to demand that, next, IMO. Guaranteed to piss off normies if congress keeps it.
My hope/guess is that Byrne is another sapper like Lin Wood. Lin is the legal side and Byrne is the tech side. Both good at what they do, have fuck you money, and can speak about controversial issues directly, that is, non-politically. Also, I think, they don't have any real political ambitions. Happy where they are. They keep Sidney shielded, who can step into a political role, if needed,