>>12143370

I wouldn't think so. I think its only about preserving the "value" of congressional bank accounts via kickbacks, bribes, etc.

"Acquaintance" in Europe says the value of dollars in exchange is going down. I think this is the result of massive amounts of "printing" of money, which I'm not sure has even resulted in more paper bills. Electronic money printing…how convenient for "them". Massive inflation should be the result although for debtors it could be a short term blessing as they are paying back their debt with "cheaper" dollars. Back to physical money should be a good option at this point, I think. Physical money has the advantage of being "good" when computers are down. Also some of the coins do have intrinsic value. I am paying with cash a lot more atm. When I wear my "face covering", don't carry a cell phone, and pay cash its harder to track what I am buying. I like privacy.

>>12143354

I have zero insider information, but I agree with anon who said this is serious.

President Trump has made every effort to let the states deal with corruption, rioting, etc. on their own, respecting our system of government to the greatest extent possible.

It does appear options are still available to ensure the truth about the election is revealed publicly and acted on appropriately. However, we have seen that our President will act decisively on terrorism especially that launched from foreign nations. What could be more terroristic than a possible bioweapon release to coincide with our election cycle and plunging the WORLD into a communist "reset"? What could be more terroristic than launching the most elaborate and encompassing election fraud (disenfranchisement of the American people) in our history?

I had the strongest impression yesterday evening that the initial blow will be so furious that heads will spin, perhaps literally among the DS. Reminded me of something in a Q drop about the initial wave "cannot go slow" if I am remembering correctly.