Al Frankin is a man-boy with a baby mind, who is obsessed with sex, who can not admit when his party has been caught trying to steal an election . . .
she's got a 'sex-toy cluelessness' look like Huma or the wife of that cabal troll guy that acts like he's Obama's brother . . . with the aunt who was a singer, George Clone.
the woman is sent in as a honey pot preditor and she's a 'victim'.
NO the people are the victims. The mistress and the king are both culprets.
my point is that the seductress of a cabal is NOT a victim, but a preditor.
who cares what their names are it's the same story for 3000 years
gatekeeper doesn't let anyone talk.
I know all about cabal bait women and how they pray on good men.
how dare I be chatty and not sanctioned by copypasta troller
if you need someone to give you answers to those questions then you are in a catagory of an odd type as you imply those are who would support that.
why don't you throw away the word 'genocide' and just use the word 'murder'
do you need someone to answer those questions?
if so . . . I have conclusions 'bout you that would be tasteless and trite to share and are implied with this tasteless and trite post.
so I figure you don't really not-know the answers to those questions of ''Is mass murder okay" question mark.
the punctuation shows a tasteless oddity when one uses the methods, but isn't really attending to the content of the argument.
tagged you by accident.
"call it "murder". Whatever"
why are you suggesting what I believe?
do you me a 'third person singular' use of 'you'?
you don't think I'd want anyone to do what you suggest and say?
of course not. you use the wrong pronoun.
you use 'you' when it should be formally a 'one' and why? because it makes it sound that you are accusing me.
ah, and then you use a pejorative to describe a group of people?
in your case you don't show what you ever believe, you just mock the whole process of being mentored and care not about my discussions nor about the answers that you only pretend to ask. you use vulgar language that is intentinally designed as a 'test' for the 'subjects' who you inflict with your bogus concoction.
I'd not answer your lurid question except here it is: there are types of questions that when creepy phonies, who call pepole the n-word, and use vulgar plurals for the members of a crowd, that when you hear
those kinds of questions,
you tastefully back out of the situation and do not let the psychopath explain any more about it.
the choices you make up have no sense or value and the bait quality of the whole encounter having been 'splained in detail-ish quality, and you stupidly using a vulgar-plurality for the members of a group . . .
you can either choose to just go away or post back a boast post which is the shills common habit in these situations . . .
not eating?
the person who it's supposedly doing it did the (or someone pretending to be him did)
the same thing many many many months, over a year ago.
and his license, and pictures of him posing.
and gold coins, and other identity material that identified him as . . . . . . … . . .
who was friends of . . . . . …
and he was obsessed back them too with HC.
and from time to time the same creepy guy (or someone posing has him) trolls the same kind of 'desparate methhead can't use Craigs list' behavior that this guy CL does (his initials, supposedly).