>>12144132 Trump gives Barr and Durham power to present classified information to grand jury in Trump-Russia investigation

Anons did anyone else think this announcement by Barr (quote below), as one of his last indictments picks this case, was really odd?. I don’t know but there might be a bigger story or clues in this indictment to other conspirators in the US and World. And “what if” this group of conspirators are planning something of this nature now. The timing and subject is strange enough to question, “why now?” It might be something to dig on. What you say?

“Barr, who appeared at a Justice Department press conference on Monday to announce charges against a Libyan bomb-maker whom the United States believes played a key role in the terrorist attack that brought down Pan Am Flight 103 in 1988, weighed in on the Durham investigation days before his tenure ends this week.”

>>12145118 Archbishop Viganò has a new Letter: THE VATICAN: A Den of Thieves

Complete letter

THE VATICAN: A Den of Thieves

Written by  +Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

>>12145624

>>12145118 Archbishop Viganò has a new Letter: THE VATICAN: A Den of Thieves

2nd half of letter

But as I have already pointed out, it would be misleading to limit oneself to an evaluation of events within the Church without framing them in the wider political and social context: there is only one direction being given in which both the main protagonists as well as the extras follow the same script. The purpose has now been declared: destroying Nations from within by means of the deep state and the Church of Christ by means of the deep church, in order to establish the kingdom of the Antichrist, with the help of the False Prophet.

The secret Sino-Vatican agreement, very strongly desired by Bergoglio and renewed a few weeks ago, fits perfectly into this disturbing picture, confirming the pactum sceleris which consigns Chinese Catholics to persecution, dissidents to reeducation, churches to demolition, Sacred Scripture to censorship and adulteration. It is no coincidence that this agreement, which the Popes always refused with disdain, was made possible thanks to the offices of the former Cardinal McCarrick and his accomplices, with the decisive help of the Jesuits: the actors, we know, are always the same. They are both corrupted and corruptors, both blackmailed and blackmailers, all united by their rebellion against doctrine and morals and indiscriminately subservient to anti-Catholic, indeed anti-Christian, powers.

Communist China constitutes the militant arm of the New World Order, both in the spread of a mutant virus created in a laboratory, as well as in the interference in the American Presidential elections and the enlistment of fifth columns in the service of Beijing regime. It also promotes the apostasy of the leaders of the Church, preventing her from proclaiming the Gospel and placing herself as a defending wall against the attack of the élite. The fact that this brings economic advantages for the Vatican makes the Bergoglian sect’s subservience to this infernal plan even more shameful, creating a significant counterpoint to the business of migrants, which is also part of the intentional dissolution of the society that once was Christian. It is disconcerting that such a scandalous betrayal of the mission of the Catholic Church does not merit firm and courageous condemnation from the Episcopate, which – in the face of evidence of an apostasy pursued with ever greater determination – does not dare to raise its voice out of fear or a false concept of prudence.

The words of Dr. Arthur Tane, Director of the Council on Middle East Relations, may sound bold and strong, but they have the merit of highlighting without false fears the subversion carried out under this most ominous “pontificate.” It is to be hoped that with the publication of Tane’s letter to Cardinal Parolin there will be some who will finally open their eyes, before the plot of the conspirators is accomplished. In this regard, we agree with commendable denunciation made by Cardinal Burke on the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe about the use of Covid for the purposes of the “Great Reset” – a denunciation that joins the one I made last May and have reiterated many times, as well as that of other Pastors who are faithful to the Word of God and solicitous towards their flock.

The letter of Arthur Tane to the Secretary of State closes with a citation from the Gospel that is more appropriate than ever: “Either the Church understands the significance of its mission, or it itself has become a temple of money changers. For in the words of Jesus: It is written that my house will be called a house of prayer, but you are making it a den of robbers (Mt 21:12-13).”

As Bishops, we cannot be silent: our silence would constitute an intolerable connivance and complicity with those mercenaries who, abusing a usurped power, deny Christ and consign souls to the Enemy of the human race.

+Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

vigano signature

Klobuchar: ‘We Have the Votes’ to Override COVID Relief Veto, Trump ‘Should Not Be Doing This Right Now’

Ian Hanchett22 Dec 2020

0:53

On Tuesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) reacted to President Donald Trump’s criticism of the coronavirus relief bill by stating that “he should not be doing this right now,” and that there are the needed votes to override any potential veto of the bill.

Klobuchar said, “It is the second biggest stimulus in the history of America, and for him to turn this down — obviously, we have the votes to override his veto in the houses. We have those votes. But he should not be doing this right now, whenhis own Treasury Secretary, Steve Mnuchin, was involved in the negotiations from beginning to end

Ok what is Mnuchin doing?

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/12/22/klobuchar-we-have-the-votes-to-override-covid-relief-veto-trump-should-not-be-doing-this-right-now/

Marco Rubio Steers Coronavirus Checks to American Families with Illegal Aliens

Neil Munro23 Dec 2020

I’m sick of these false representatives of America

The 2021 omnibus bill sends coronavirus aid checks to “mixed-status” families that include illegal migrant spouses and Americans.

The expansion was pushed by Democrats and some GOP legislators, including Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC). CBS reported:

Under the agreement, U.S. citizens and green card holders will be able to receive $600 in direct aid, even if they filed a joint tax return with an undocumented spouse, as well as additional $600 checks per dependent child, according to congressional aides and the text of the legislation.

The new compromise would also retroactively make mixed-status families eligible for the $1,200 per household and $500 per child checks allocated by the CARES Act, which was enacted in late March.

“No American should have been blocked from receiving federal assistance during a global pandemic because of who they married,” Rubio said in a statement. “I thank Senator Tillis and my other Senate colleagues for their leadership in getting this across the finish line.”

The Migration Policy Institute estimates the Rubio measure will provide aid checks to families with a total of roughly 3.7 million U.S.-born children and 1.4 million U.S. spouses. Roughly one-third live in California, one-sixth live in Texas, and one-thirteenth live in New York.

The funding was blocked in prior emergency bills because the family aid will be quietly shared with roughly nine million additional illegal aliens in the mixed-status families.

So the Rubio amendment marks another blurring of the distinction between Americans and foreigners that are so valuable to ordinary Americans but are increasingly disdained by progressives and wealthy Americans.

The 2021 spending bill includes few steps to help protect that distinction. For example, it also cuts funding for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and many other protections against the foreign economic migrants who drive Americans’ wages down and push Americans’ rents up.

The spending measure is also backed by business groups, in part, because the aid checks will help pay for groceries, rents, and other expenses.

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2020/12/23/marco-rubio-coronavirus-checks-families-illegal-aliens/

Biggs: COVID Relief Bill ‘Should Be Vetoed’ by Pocket Veto

Ian Hanchett22 Dec 2020

0:46

A few good men

On Tuesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Biggs (R-AZ) stated that the coronavirus relief bill “should be vetoed” by President Donald Trump via a pocket veto, “and I’m hoping it will be.”

Biggs said, “Well, I — this is the worst bill, and it typifies the swamp. Because it’s terrible, both from a process and a substantive point of view.”

He added that he hopes Trump can employ a pocket veto so there isn’t an override vote, and that “this bill should be vetoed, and I’m hoping it will be.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/12/22/biggs-covid-relief-bill-should-be-vetoed-by-pocket-veto/

Governor Abbott Announces Plan to Take Over Austin Police Department

If BLM is against it, I’m for it

Texas Governor Greg Abbott is proposing that the state take control of the Austin Police Department after the city council cut $21 million from the budget.

Can Abbott really do that? He previously suggested freezing property taxes of cities that defund their police departments. Taking over the management of a city police force by folding it into the Texas Department of Public Safety is a novel approach to preventing the inmates from running the asylum.

The Austin American Statesmen writes that the “Texas Constitution grants the state authority over local matters in the capital city when a statewide importance is determined.” That would seem to make Abbott’s proposal constitutional.

KXAN:

The tweet from Gov. Abbott was not a surprise. Just days earlier, he had promised to pass the legislation in the upcoming session.

“The state will fix this,” Abbott wrote on Twitter. “Texas will pass a law this session supporting law enforcement and defunding cities that defund the police.”

Back in September, Abbott expressed his displeasure with Austin City Council’s decision to cut $20 million from APD’s budget, in addition to transitioning $130 million out over a year. The council’s decision came after harsh criticism of the way APD handled protesters over the summer.

“Harsh criticism” from whom? Black Lives Matter and antifa protesters may not have liked being prevented from destroying the city, but they’re hardly neutral observers.

Back in September, Abbott expressed his displeasure with Austin City Council’s decision to cut $20 million from APD’s budget, in addition to transitioning $130 million out over a year. The council’s decision came after harsh criticism of the way APD handled protesters over the summer.

The move was condemned by Abbott, who called it “disrespect for law enforcement” that would invite chaos and endanger the public.

Abbott received a legislation proposal in September that would allow cities with over 1 million residents and fewer than two police officers per 1,000 to have its police force consolidated with the Texas Department of Public Safety.

Back in September when Abbott said he was looking at taking over the Austin PD, one member of the city council referred to the idea as a “distraction.” “We’ve gotten used to threats by tweet and authoritarian threats by tweet whether it’s out of the Governor’s Office or the White House,” council member Greg Casar told KXAN.

This may not be the best time to talk about defunding the police. Murders are up 55 percent in Austin over the same period last year, as are other violent crimes. Abbott is absolutely right in not allowing BLM and antifa to dictate public policy — especially when those policies were formulated in the midst of a heated national election.

As it is, defunding the police cost Democrats dearly at the polls, as did their other kooky ideas. Perhaps the city council should take a second look at the funding cuts and grow a spine to stand up to the BLM bullies.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2020/12/22/governor-abbott-announces-plan-to-take-over-austin-police-department-n1224319

John Basham 🇺🇲

@JohnBasham

Please Pray That @VP@Mike_Pence Does The Right Thing On December 23rdIt's The First Step In Pushing Back Against The Election Fraud!

11:29 PM · Dec 22, 2020·Twitter for Android

https://twitter.com/JohnBasham/status/1341601759786127360?s=20

John Basham 🇺🇲 Retweeted

EconChick/IntelChick

@MikayesFiona

Rick Gates confirms Durham's investigation expanded to cover Hillary's Foundation

He believes there will be about 5 indictments, including Comey. I agreed with other 4 people he mentioned like McCabe and Priestap but I don't believe Comey will be indicted.

9:00 PM · Dec 22, 2020·Twitter Web App

https://twitter.com/MikayesFiona/status/1341564295432298496?s=20

John Basham 🇺🇲

@JohnBasham

Replying to

@JohnBasham

CONTD: House Amendment 833 To House Resolution 6395

H.Amdt. 833 (Escobar) to H.R. 6395: To require certifications be … House Vote #141 Jul 20,…

govtrack.us

7:02 PM · Dec 22, 2020·Twitter for Android

Isn’t congress trying to amend the constitution? If so can they do it like this?

Congress Votes House Vote #141 in 2020 (116th Congress)

H.Amdt. 833 (Escobar) to H.R. 6395: To require certifications be made to Congress when the President deploys active duty military within the United States during civil unrest by amending the Insurrection Act in Title 10, Chapter 13 of U.S. Code.

Jul 20, 2020 at 5:54 p.m. ET. On the Amendment in the House.

This was a vote to approve or reject amendment H.Amdt. 833 (Veronica Escobar) to H.R. 6395. The title of the amendment is H.Amdt. 833 (Escobar) to H.R. 6395: To require certifications be made to Congress when the President deploys active duty military within the United States during civil unrest by amending the Insurrection Act in Title 10, Chapter 13 of U.S. Code..

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/116-2020/h141