Anonymous ID: bef7af Dec. 23, 2020, 7:10 a.m. No.12145594   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5609 >>5637

>>12145528

So you are having difficulty with the difference between 'there is' and 'there is no'.

IP hopping? Are you just triggered that multiple separate people are all independently identifying inauthentic AND PROJECTING 'anons'?

 

Q said there is no QAnon and there is no disinformation or deflection that you fan engage in that will change that.

 

Cope.

Anonymous ID: bef7af Dec. 23, 2020, 7:17 a.m. No.12145655   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5663

>>12145622

Why do you attack what Q said?

Why do you project your own personal subjective statements to be the real Q?

Q said 'There is no 'QAnon''.

 

Why do you demand that your statements overrule what Q said?

 

THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881

 

Why does that statement by Q trigger you, if not for a desire to make 'QAnon' something other than a fake news narrative to attack Q?

Anonymous ID: bef7af Dec. 23, 2020, 7:21 a.m. No.12145695   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5709 >>5714 >>5770

>>12145663

Why do you ignore what Q said?

 

Q said

 

"There is no 'QAnon'"

 

It's in drop 4881.

 

Why are you reacting to a Q drop by accusing Anons who post that info, of being 'inauthentic'?

 

How is an anon posting a Q drop indicative of anon being 'inauthentic'?

 

Q wrote in Q4881 "There is no 'QAnon'"

 

Why does that drop trigger you into attack mode?

 

Why attack what Q dropped?

 

Do you know what psychological projection means?

Anonymous ID: bef7af Dec. 23, 2020, 7:25 a.m. No.12145752   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5771 >>5782

>>12145664

You feel 'lectured'?

Too bad, anon is just exercising their own free speech.

>lecturing people on stepping outside of the programmed normie groupthink.

But you're doing the exact opposite of that. You are trying to defend a fake news creation they came up with to attack Q.

 

Fake News keeps writing about 'QAnon', which Q said doesn't exist.

You are not stepping outside normie group think, you're pushing it by attacking Q's drop that there is NO 'QAnon'.

You're the one lecturing people to stay inside the normie group think fake news box.

Anonymous ID: bef7af Dec. 23, 2020, 7:29 a.m. No.12145793   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6036

>>12145762

Joe M is right!

Constitution is perfectly capable of handling an election.

Q/Q+ team ensured the narrative would be election fraud by 'allowing' the criminals to get on record, all to keep the fake news and Democrat establishment occupied.

 

Once Trump takes office again Jan 20 (which will be 'known' by Jan 6), that's when the insurrection act will be acted upon and the traitors arrested.

Anonymous ID: bef7af Dec. 23, 2020, 7:37 a.m. No.12145882   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5902 >>5976

>>12145782

>I defend nothingโ€ฆ

โ€ฆexcept what you are in fact defending which is the fake news creation of 'QAnon' as something other than the fake news' own creation.

Even POTUS has said on multiple occasions that "I don't anything about 'QAnon'".

Will you attack the President as well?

You claim to hate authoritarian consensus builders, but you're pushing fake news intentionally 'authoritarian' consensus building to make people believe the falsehood that there is a 'QAnon'.

Q said in drop 4881 that there is no 'QAnon'.

POTUS said he doesn't know anything about any 'QAnon'.

Yet here you are trying to defend the fake news authoritarian consensus attempt to truck people into believing there is such a thing as a 'QAnon'.

You're projecting your own 'self-righteousness'. I am just posting a Q drop that for reasons Anons know TRIGGERS THE SHIT OUT OF YOU.

>your own meaningless existence

Awww, what's the matter, you never read any critiques of existentialist philosophy have you? Fell hook, line and sinker into IRRATIONALIST propaganda?

Never read enlightenment philosophy?

Too bad that you perceive your own existence as 'meaningless'.

There you are trying to convince what you yourself perceive as 'meaningless existence'.

If truly meaningless, you wouldn't be sending words over the internet trying to enforce a meaning into anon's mind that you will never succeed in doing.

I think for myself.

There is no 'QAnon'.

Cope.

Anonymous ID: bef7af Dec. 23, 2020, 7:48 a.m. No.12146010   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6035 >>6038

>>12145937

Still triggered over a Q drop?

"There is no 'QAnon'" - Q4881

Why does that drop trigger you?

>Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q

>SAME DROP!

 

Hahahaha.

There is 'Q'

There are 'Anons'

Those are also in the same drop.

By your logic, these two statements imply there is 'QAnon'โ€ฆafter all, I just juxtaposed them together like you are doing!

>You got called out

Nah that's just what you hope and plead and want other anons to believe, because you can't refute what Q said.

THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881

Why does that statement trigger you into attack mode if not for the fact that you're not an authentic anon?

Ruh roh!

Projection is a helluva drug?

If you don't want me to ignore "Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q" then I will say OK I won't, but you're still ignoring

There is no 'QAnon'which Q posted 'iN tHe sAmE dRoP! HuRr dUrR'