>I am not writing anything Q DIDN'T write when I write
But you ARE ignoring Q calling you and your wee band of consensus makers when you ignore
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q
>did you say "injected"?
Kek, yes that was one of the words that Q used in a sentence. Which was one of the sentences he used in an entire post. A single post which was a response to a tweet he reposted.
>But you're not Q so you don't know which Anon comments Q was referring to.
Yet you are not Q and insist what you believe to be fact.
Fact is that Q pointed at you and your ip hopping consensus making terrorists directly when he stated
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q
>Repeat it enough and you will believe it
That is exactly the goal they have. Thus them ignoring getting called out in the very post they hold up as evidence.
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q
>you keep denying the conclusive "There is no 'QAnon'" statement from Q.
>Nothing you say changes this.
You keep ignoring getting called out by Q
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q
Nothing you say changes that.
>There is Q.
>There are 'Anons'.
>There is no 'QAnon'.
>Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
And then!
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q
>You're trying to call out Anon by pretending to read Q's minds.
>Yes, I 'ignore' inauthentic anons pretending to read Q's minds.
>You keep ignoring
>THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881
Your hypocrisy is legend.
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q
Makes it all that much more easy to see that Q was pointing directly at you and your little band of tights wearing merry 'men'
>>And then!
>Attack me all you want, it will never change this Q drop:
I know right?!
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
>Attack me all you want, it will never change this statement from Q:
>THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881
I havent, but Q did!
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
>Attack me all YOU want, you can't read Q's minds. You don't know who Q concludes on this day to be authentic or inauthentic.
>THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881
dont have to, Q already did!
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
>There is no 'QAnon' - Q4881
You missed this
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
>>Q already did
>…is itself you claiming to read Q's minds. You don't know who Q concludes on this day to be authentic or inauthentic.
>THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881
Legendary hypocrisy exhibited by you. However, since Q called you out, your beef is with him.
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
>You ignored this:
>THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881
Its what he was calling out when he said
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
He was pointing all of you injected false anons out!