from the latest Strzok - Paige texting records:
"Paige: nothing like a 4am email that British (censored) needs to talk urgently."
(censored) would not be "ambassador" because that would not be classified would it? So it's a short one, maybe British PM ?
Was Teresa May in on this?
(repeated from #751 of last bread for visibility)
My guess is that Trump had him in this investigative role because he's valued as an investigator and can't run the FBI any more. Best I can figure out from Q's crumb.
What does a witch hunt hunt for? A witch.
Is Trump a witch? Not that I am aware.
Is Hillary a witch?
(sorry for Q-ish style, I just felt like it.)
After all Trump could have kept calling it "covfefe" or simply "wild goose chase", a phrasing more in line with his personality. But he keeps calling it "witch hunt". I think they are hunting for a witch, which leaves out Trump.
It's not evidence yet though, because no court was supervising it.
Donno, not a lawyer, but I guess that's what I would say in their shoes.
Is that right? It can be inadmissible if you can show a disqualifying problem in the chain of custody. But if say there's no chain of custody known at all, isn't it presumptively admissible?