>>12157525 (lb)

>They believe that people are good.

That is a generalization.

>They believe there is no personal God.

That is a generalization.

>They believe that equality should be the goal of mankind.

That is a generalization.

>They believe all truth is relative.

That is a generalization.

>They believe all sorts of things that are false.

That is a generalization.

You have some points that are valid about some subsets of people on the left. You could apply that same set of generalizations to some subsets of people on the right. You also didn't put much effort into countering the effects of information warfare on people's minds. There are good people on both sides, remember? Everyone's personal quest to find/disprove God is irrelevant as because there are moral atheists and agnostics. To suggest otherwise is, again, a generalization. I'm not a post modernist, but we've learned that the victors write history. The British conquering the Zulu, for example, was a great win for the British Crown. It was a devastating infringement on freedom for the people of the Zulu tribe, and an atrocity. Who's correct?

Might want to step up your trolling game a bit. It's not working.

>>12157741

Sure. Again, the issue is with these nations leaders. If you are more valiantly defending these people and their cultures more so than they are, then your fight isn't with Q or anons. You grasp what's at stake, but are knocking at the wrong door for discussion. We've learned why the DS is doing it. It's up to people to fight back against subversion. In order to do that, people need to unite behind their own causes of patriotism. If, all of a sudden, it becomes about "race" instead of strategic removal of subversive infiltrators, then we'll be fighting each other sooner than accomplishing the goal of getting rid of traitors and globalists.

>>12157819

Shucky Ducky!

>>12157850

70%.

>>12157826

>>12157853

>>12157868

>>12157876

>>12157893

>>12157904

Here's a blurb I did yesterday. It was in response to this anon:

>>12151588

My Response:

>>12152054

>>12157917

Last two links are (PB). Sorry!

>>12157902

>>12157924

It should have never passed to begin with. NEVER.

>>12157929

Man helped Ebola infect humans.

Man helped RNA viruses infect humans.

Man created vaccines to "solve" the problem of the viruses they created.

Why did @POTUS point to 1918? The Spanish Flu broke out a short while after the discovery of viruses by Dmitri Ivanovsky. The first flu outbreak occurred after they were discovered, and contributed to the rise of communism in Russia. Read that sentence again.

A case could be made that every single flu variant is, indeed, an invention from man. Man created the issue. Man created the problem. Man invented a "solution" that is used to further propagate their extermination and experimentation agenda. Evil people, doing evil things. Call it "God" or Nature or whatever, we were probably doing just fine before man got involved in these things. The question is, why was it allowed to happen? Ask yourself where you can find answers to these questions, and what can be done to stop these people once and for all.

>>12157965

>One can’t fight back effectively against real world phenomena whose origin, fundamental purposes, and existential threats one does not understand.

Correct, but to wrap that problem up in a package called "Race" is doing a severe injustice to the real issue of control of nations. Take "vote" out of the equation and you still have people being overran by foreign interests; at the "High Planning" level, and at the individual level. The real purpose, as Q has helped anons discover, isn't race replacement. It's control of nations. Don't focus on race. Focus on the pieces on the board (globe).

>>12158010

>Imagine the fear

I stir it in my covfefe every morning, fren.

>>12158050

Check it:

>>12158023

The problem isn't "God". It's man. Then you start down a scary rabbit hole of "well, why did Jesus allow Ebola to be discovered by man", and then you have some reconciling to do. So instead of going down that rabbit hole (save for later), let's focus on what we can knowingly prove.

Man discovered viruses. Some men took that knowledge to commit evil acts. Some are trying to combat it with truth (HCQ and other meds instead of just vacs). Q even said not all vaccines are bad. Stick to what we can prove, and let's go after those we know are trying to poison us. Leave God out of the argument for a moment, and put your faith to works.

>>12158130

>Covid patients

COVID diagnosed patients, anon. Hospitals are short on cash, remember?

>>12158131

>>12158150

People catch stuff floating around, and they get sick. Sometimes its viruses, and sometimes it's not. People that don't get vaccines, and live through viruses develop antibodies and are "mostly" immune to future exposures and even variants.

What's puzzling to some is how antibacterials and immunoboosting compounds like HCQ and Zinc can actually help the body with prophylactic and therapeutic responses. Perhaps some viruses are parasites? Perhaps we need to rethink how we treat and prevent viruses? No doubt, many vaccines are just poison; I already addressed this. Some, however, aren't poison. Did Q leave it to anons to figure out which ones?

Why yes. Yes, Q did leave it to us.

>>12158224

Howso?