Maybe a legalfag can help me out,

Cohen raid by FBI?

…

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?

I don't see how the Cohen raid -legally introduce evidence. I have a feeling that a whole majority of judges (even/especially? white hats) would not take kindly to admitting anything the lawyer had into evidence because of privilege. The only way I can see it making sense is if Cohen was part of the crime, but then why would they let Trump continue to be associated with him, but then 4D chess if it was a plan to taken Cohen down too? My head starting to hurt.

>>1216293

Some details on Cohen's side businesses and relationships. Interesting reading this now knowing it was written in Feb 25th.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-longtime-lawyer-michael-cohen-knows-way-too-much-so-why-is-he-still-in-exile?ref=home

>>1216339

>>>You're jerking our chain to get a reaction from (((them)))

I think an anon summed it up best yesterday. We are along for the ride getting taken from time to time (as Q was up front about). For that we get the news first. Notice how when news becomes public either we know first or second after Hannity or Sarah Carter a lot of the time.