>>12164510

Why can you post your own posts in this case, but you refuse to post the "notabled" posts in the other case?

Also why didn't you provide sauce in these posts?

It's easy, just post a link.

Baker ignores shit that has no link.

That happens for everything.

And you know a link would be nice for such information, so that people can check for themselves.

See:

https://ifamericansknew.org

https://ifamericansknew.org

https://ifamericansknew.org

https://ifamericansknew.org

And this post won't get censored. Just do it.

>>12164548

Some people are losing their minds atm.

It's a hilarious sight.

Notable thread:

Ctrl-F "Israel" - 154 matches

Ctrl-F "Jew" - 148 matches, most shit from them, but some actually real notables

So much for their so called censorship.

>>12164651

>Hmm, seem to recall seeing this link the other night when You baked.

>Your self confirmed Notable, with NO description

I didn't bake at all, ever.

Sorry.

You are mixing me up with the moron that I replied to, who goes on about his "Jewish"-everything notables, which were regular anon-posts.

These are shit, objectively.

These other posts had no link with them, he probably did that intentionally because he knows that posts without sauce will be ignored by baker, that way he can complain about the current baker, and then his baker friend takes them, although they had no sauce.

>>12164812

Some bakers collect everything that can be remotely seen as good, including shit.

An opinion about a Q drop or something in the future can actually be interesting and insightful, and I don't see a problem notable'ing these

Israeli-Palestinian-death counts require proper links. Just posting some graphic and wanting it to be notabled is retarded. That other anon knew exactly what he was doing. He's is quite obviously hiding the information that would make it obvious that he's spreading nonsense.

That specific site actually has links to official sources, I haven't checked them for accuracy, because I'm not into that topic, but at least it has that.

>>12164991

>If that is your standard, then it should be applied across the board.

An opinion of an Anon obviously can't be sourced.

You can specify sources that help your argument.

When it's about a Q drop anyone can check for themselves anyway. There is a factual list of them.

>When you have no standards, everything is important.

In that specific case, we are talking about real bullshit.

See >>12128755

and >>12128780

The muppet doesn't link there, because then anons can easily check the posts themselves.

Someone posts "FILTERED" to all his bullshit, he makes it a notable and calls it "Jewish Filtering".

Or spams the board, gets banned and calls it "Jewish censorship". Probably the same faggot who posted CP, got banned for it, and called that censorship as well. It's ridiculous.

It's even more ridiculous because if he actually thinks this board is even modded by Jews, then wtf is he doing here?

It's bullshit and nonsense. I would not be okay with deleting anything out of dough, but in this case it's objectively bullshit.