ALL LINKS PREVIOUS BREAD
>>12166495 (PB) OSS
>We will never get rid of them (/comms/ -also known as- /midnightriders/ bakers), we just have to learn to work around them
>>12166514 (PB) barkeep
>this is where my head is at, friend
>>12166541 (PB) current baker
>Ummm. You handed off to me on ghost?
>>12166657 (PB) barkeep
>to be perfectly clear, and in the interest of full disclosure, am I speaking with JonDoodle right now?
that you Doodle?
>Yes.
5:5 bakes
well, if you are the JonDoodle I know
then I have not referenced you in any way
although I recognize OSS believes differently
I have only been referencing bakers who previously operated from the /comms/ board, and have since moved to the /midnightriders/ board/
I am referencing these baker specifically creating NEW persona's
and attempting to return to /qresearch/ as "new bakers"
that is a fucking fact
they HAVE done that
/comms/ baker 'be' specifically, for one, as seen here in pic related
although others have also attempted the same routine
so
if you are indeed the new baker I watched struggle and continue to succeed and overcome
I have not refereneced you
and I hope this explanation might help you understand why there me be extra scrutiny of "new bakers" at the current time
I am not ready to throw you under that bus
to be perfectly clear
I AM ready to throw BakerBoss under that bus
but I think BakerBoss has recognized that persona is already burned, and has moved on
all of this said in the interest of FULL DISCLOSURE
>/comms/ baker 'be' specifically, for one, as seen here in pic related
>I'm just going to shut up and bake
absolutely your choice bakes
thank you for your service
>Go through the last 4 breads and look at the baker attacks. That's the last I'm going to say about it.
baker is gonna get flak
from shills
from glowies
and yes
even from anons
I have seen it
I specifically told you gold fringe flag was going to be dificult to defend
I specifically told you that EDITING the PREVIOUS BAKERS notables was not ethically defnsible, even in the case of legitimately BULLSHIT notables
you, graciously came up with an initial compromise
I am giving you that
and then, I am assuming as a result of the ongoing attack from OSS, decided to spoiler the notes indead of deleting them
fucking with previous bakers notes has been ground for INSTANT bread split
and yes
OSS and anons did NOT split your bread
we "talked" it out instead
in the manner of discussion ususally found here
as in
less than cordial
decisions have consquences
you decided to edit the previous bakers work
that decision now has fallout
I am not saying I support everything OSS is doing either
I dont support spamming the board
ever
period
but I am not OSS
and am not in control of his free will
>What makes you think I edited previous notables? WRONG
that wasnt you?!
5:5 Doodle
I'll take your word for it
>The night you deleted my notables, and this evening on /MNR/
yes
that proves the person that deleted your notes is MOST LIKELY that same poster over on Midnight Riders
I just went back are reviewed the breads in question
the baker that removed your notes doesnt actually look like doodle to me
the only connection between that baker
(baked two breads #15485, #15486) and Doodle is the use of the Gold Fringe OP banner as far as I can tell
and the use of controlc.com
-which isnt much of a confirmation of anything
so
connect the baker of #15485 and #15486 to JonDoodle
I currently dont see it
I DO however see the connection between comms/midnightriders baker and the baker of #15485/86 that deleted the notes
-that much seems pretty solidly confirmed
which one of them was it?
-needs to be firther confirmed
>baker that removed your notes doesnt actually look like doodle to me
I could obviously be wrong
that is just my sense
>>12129083 (PB)
>>12129083 (PB)
>>12129083 (PB)
>>12129083 (PB)
>>12129083 (PB) #15486 this is the baker speaking
>No, its so newsbaker can do the aggregations without aggravation
this seems like the most IDEN-able post from the two breads too me
other than the text-moji's (kek, that is a SOLID IDEN lock)
baker fucked with your notes so:
-newsbaker (who the fuck is that, acbu possibly?)
-can fo the aggregations (muhAggregator… acbu?)
so, it was done ON BEHALF OF muhAggregator anon?
that DEFINITELY seems like 'someone' we know well
>That's how they are coordinating it, they hand off between breads here via communications on the /MNR/ board
kek
I thought I had noticed baker changes without handoffs going on
and I am expected to believe we have a baker that can bake 18 hours a day for weeks?
top fucking kek
no
there have been ghost hand-off for fucking sure
and SOME muhEPIC RUN bakers are quite fucking obviously multiple /comms/ bakers handing off in "secret"
obvious shit is obvious
for the record OSS
THANK YOU FOR KEEPING AN EYE ON THEIR OFF BOARD HAND-OUTS
I am not giving them one iota of my energy or attention
thank you for gathering and sharing the intel that you do
>Must be miserable on their part, making all these elaborate plans which get foiled publically, over and over.
I mean
they are still here doing it
3 years and counting now
>Tired of being the only vocal person fighting
we all have out roles to play
I am OBVIOUSLY not silent on the subject
kek
>there's a line between airing greivances and spamming shit everyone already knows and sees.
5:5 anon
trying to walk that line
>Welcome tot he suck = comms
-barkeep here
actually
that was said to me by BO back in October during one of the many bread splits
BO locked my bread after the /comms/ split bread out-paced it
I asked what dafuq in META
and BO appologized for the friendly fire by saying this one line
"Welcome to the suck."
I still thank him for reminding me to do so
>actually I was quoting fastjack, not comms.
>actually
>that was said to me by BO back in October during one of the many bread splits
BO = FastJack
confirmed
>Most of the shills appear to gang up on OSS and this is very curious. While they still leave other anons completely alone…
the shills leave AnimeBaker alone?
as one notable example
kek
the shills leave NO ONE alone
I literally kek'd
>They gonn try to talk about post count next, fuckin losers
KEK
you called it anon
inb4 IP hoping post count jannies
>And when it was brought up again by GYB (netflix post) it confirmed who had done it.
I witnessed that as well
for what its worth
>I think you know what you are going to get.
it better be a fucking sugar cookie with a lot of icing
I fucking hate oatmeal cookies
>I know how I come off, and I am fine with it
doesnt bother me any
I fully admit I can be an asshole
but
I am not like
100% a dick
shitposting dies hard man
kek
gonna call me out?
that is fucking notable in my book
kek again
>Baker, can you set this anon up?
got you anon
>Ho ho, pour me one too bk!
5:5 anon!