>>1216405
from last bread
lawfag here
its a strange approach
search warrant are not a fishing license
they have to specify the location and nature of the evidence to be seized
lots of legal issue arise where evidence of "other crimes" is "inadvertantly discovered" in this process
as a former DDA and defense attorney i would not rely on it
my guess is the warrant specified what they were looking for
dont believe that warrant is public at this time
anons?
no a warrant would need to be more specific than that
it has to allege FACTS that constitute PROBABLE CAUSE to believe evidence of a crime is at the specific location
DOJ stated cohen IS a suspect and they knew the evidence they wanted and where they thought it was
hard to believe cohen would be part of that plan
very strange indeed
evidence legally obtained would be admissable in any court for any purpose
subject to normal rules of evidence ie authentication hearsay etc
lawfag here
my answer is that Q only said the stormy daniels thing was the ?public context" for the raid but implied "other documents were collected" and "other places raided"
so the warrant HAD to include all these things and since the affadavits for the warrant are not public we can safely assume there is lot of info there
sicne "they have it all" they knew what cohen had and were reverse engineering the collection of legally admissible evidence
this is the way since all they know was obtained more or less illegally
they have to pick the same fruit from a non poison tree so to speak
lawfag here again
no evidence of crimes in plain sight is admissible
but there is always fuckery on these things so good pros. look at that with caution
any answer to the 1st question doesnt really change anything that i can see
not sure what you are getting at in the 2nd one
who would leave such a disclaimer and why?
cant imagine someone admitting they planted evidence
dont think that is an issue anon
to be more specific if the evidence was NOT described in the warrant but was in PLAIN VIEW pursuant to the execution of the warrant it would be admissible
in your example this would appear to be the case
baker notable re potus misepell tweets
>>>1216906
>>>1216973
>Mueller was appointed on May 17th.
>POTUS tweet using councel with the same spelling is written on May 18th.
>Guys, I believe this is a huge marker.
>Beginning and END…gonna be a happening.
>May 18, 2017 06:39:19 AM
>With all of the illegal acts that took place in the Clinton campaign & Obama Administration, there was never a special councel appointed!
if cohen had that info as a result of attorney client relations he would not be able to give it to law enforcement but potus could since he is not a lawyer
but if the evidence was found pursuant to a properly executed warrant and search privilage would not apply
perhaps that is why potus kept saying privilage is dead?
save the best for last….
Jerusalem Post Israel News
NEW EMBASSY QUARTER TO BE BUILT IN JERUSALEM, COULD BE CALLED 'TRUMP TOWN’
“There is an apparent pattern of embassies moving to Jerusalem, and we have to start getting ready now.”
BY GIL HOFFMAN APRIL 27, 2018 02:20
https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/New-embassy-quarter-in-Jerusalem-to-be-built-could-be-called-Trump-Town-552860