Anonymous ID: a60ff6 April 27, 2018, 6:52 p.m. No.1216953   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7016

>>1216921

Not sure if this is a hurdle, but am not a lawfag, what if they obtained a warrant under the guidelines provided for in Rosenstein's directive for the Special Council. This would include, "Any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."

Anonymous ID: a60ff6 April 27, 2018, 7 p.m. No.1217041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7294

>>1217016

Thanks for clarification. Asked this on the last bread, wondering if you had any input on these as well:

 

Couple of questions:

If the intent of the Cohen raid is to allow for the inclusion of otherwise non-admissable NSA data into a legally binding investigation, what's the planned response for when the question inevitably comes up, "You had all this information for how long, and didn't act on it?"

 

If you included a disclaimer or memo with all of the pertinent data, saying that the information directly pulled from NSA/MI sources would not be directly admissible into a court of law and the information was deliberately left at a planned raid of Cohen's office to shield from political and potential legal fallout of sitting on this information, would that directly affect the admissibility of the information into the court of law?

Anonymous ID: a60ff6 April 27, 2018, 7:03 p.m. No.1217093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7273 >>7358

>>1217016

One more question, if in the course of executing the search based on the scope of the warrant, i.e. looking for Stormy Daniels payoff information, they find in the same manilla folder labeled "Stormy Daniels Payoff Information," they find evidence that directly implicates bad actors for unrelated crimes, that evidence would be legally admissible, correct?

Anonymous ID: a60ff6 April 27, 2018, 7:20 p.m. No.1217307   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7505

>>1217294

If Trumps lawyer has information implicating massive pedophilia rings in the US provided to him by Trump who has done nothing with that information besides forwarding it to his lawyer, that'd be fairly politically damning, no?

Anonymous ID: a60ff6 April 27, 2018, 7:25 p.m. No.1217385   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1217358

Yes, this is basically what I was trying to get at. Mostly suggesting that if they were clever enough to set this up, putting the evidence in a position to be discovered during execution of the warrant would not be a high hurdle.

Anonymous ID: a60ff6 April 27, 2018, 7:28 p.m. No.1217410   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1217397

I'd like to picture her locked up in her jail cell, with the only silverware and plates she's able to use being the china she attempted to steal from the white house all those years ago.