STOP EATINGSO MUCH CARBOHYDRATES IT'S KILLING YOU
BREAKING BREAKING Published January 21, 2020 ARTICLE BREAKING BREAKING Published January 21, 2020 ARTICLE BREAKING BREAKING Published January 21, 2020
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE Published January 21, 2020
Published January 21, 2020
Breaking exclusive, I just found an article published Jan 21, 2020. Breaking exclusive big bombshell breaker breaker one nine.
They're still butthurt that their fake story 'Adam Schiff was arrested' was demolished INSTANTLY.
Dead cat has been bouncing since.
Shaddap you projecting shill.
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
Shills attacking baker
Shills attacking baker
>The president specifically called on Congress to raise the amount of the stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000. Democrats in the House offered legislation on Thursday to do so, but it was blocked by Republicans.
FALSE
Pelosi deliberately put in a poison pill of 'unanimous consent' to intentionally get the bill to fail and blame it on Republicans.
The Hill conveniently omitted that fact.
Republicans cannot 'block' any bill in the House WHEN THE D'S HAVE THE MAJORITY.
Shill attacking baker getting attacked by independently acting anons is being exposed, other shills chime in to defend shill attacking baker.
Shaddap,shill.
'Anons' who attack Q drops like Q4881:
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
As you so aptly prove.
'Anons' who attack Q drops are inauthentic, as you so aptly prove.
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
As you so aptly prove.
THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881
That was demolished last night as fake news.
Fake news
How could you know it was posted in the bread and not know it was demolished as fake news when that happened in the same bread that you're now awake and referring to.
Shill attacking baker
Shill attacking baker
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected] -Q4881
As you so aptly prove by attacking Q drops that indicate:
There is no 'QAnon' - Q4881
That shills like you can be ignored.
The burden of proof is not on Anons to 'prove an assertion false' you backwards retard.
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim he was arrested.
The fuck is wrong with you, idiot? Did you really believe that truth and evidence is about believing every fucking assertion on the internet 'until they are disproven'?
Who the fuck would be the judges of the disproof? The very same people making the assertion! It's a pathetic shill attempt to control both sides of the narrative.
So fuck off with your stupid "I make an assertion and I will be judge and jury for every reply".
Fuck you, you have the burden to prove the claim he was arrested, and so far you morons have provided ZERO proof.
I mAkE asSerTiOns, aNd uNlEsS YoU cAn cOnViNcE mE oF 'DiSpRoOf', mY aSseRTiOn sTaNdS.
Same reason you have 12 muthafuckah, and now 13
It's not Anons burden to 'disprove' anyone's assertions.
It's YOUR burden to PROVE he was arrested.
You have proof he was arrested to back up the claim Anon was replying to?
Exactly.
Do you notice the pattern in their logic exactly matches the muhjoo shills?
The muhjoo shills make 'damning accusations', and instead of providing proof as would their burden, they instead patheticslly try to flip the burden and demand from readers "disprove me or else I'm right" irrational gobbledygook.
The question I have is how can these shills be so stupid to believe nobody would notice.
It's your 14th, clown
>I don’t have proof he was arrested
It's not about what you have, it's what exists. No evidence has been presented he was arrested, yet shills are continually posting he was, without providing any evidence.
You don't have proof for an infinite number of assertions that are not reality.
>we’re currently at a stalemate
There is no 'stalemate' which would imply equality of logical validity in argument.
Claims are proven true with the burden of proof on the one claiming. Claims do not become the burden of others to disprove.
If I said you fucked goats, and then demand 'disproof' from you, will your refusal or inability to 'disprove' my accusation suddenly make my accusation true?
By the 'disprove me' logic it does.
Hanks for confirming good bread.
How do we know that audio wasn't added post production?