Anonymous ID: db316a March 2, 2021, 12:49 p.m. No.13097539   🗄️.is 🔗kun

yes, but death was a definite possibility. accept death, embrace infamy, achieve victory numbers aren ’ t everything in 2019, we currently have the largest number of people of our race in history (between 760-980million depending on definitions), yet we are losing even our smallest towns to ethnic replacement. this solution of a democratic salvation is nothing but a pipe dream, and as our enemies increase within our lands, driven by mass immigration and the invaders own higher birth rate it will be pushed further and further into the realms of impossibility. we grow older, fewer, weaker and more fundamentally closer to true death the longer we allow our birthrates to remain so catastrophically low. i had seen enough, and in anger, drove out of the the town, refusing to stay any longer in the cursed place and headed on to the next town. more deserving of life?

 

yes, predominantly an ethno-nationalist (i place importance on the health and well being of my race above all else). new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. conservatism is dead. i can be anywhere, anytime, and i can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. preventing these enemies from reaching adulthood and their full potential of effect is of the importance. in the western world this is roughly 2.06 births per woman.

>striking quickly and then exfiltrating from the area of attack was the plan, to avoid the responders of the state and to avoid a situation where i was forced to harm them.