Anonymous ID: 232d6c Dec. 25, 2020, 7:07 p.m. No.12177592   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7636 >>7643 >>7754

>>12177137

>>12177202

NOTHING has been debunked just because anons says it has. Anon is fool. The watch is the same watch. I've looked at it many ways now, there's not a single bit of difference no matter how you change the huge, specturm, flip, invert, lay over. The two watches are identical, the band is identical. This watch has nothing to do with GH. This IS the watch from Q posts. PERIOD. Whatever else it means, I have no idea, but I do know for sure that is the same watch. They cannot be had by just anyone, there are EXTREMELY expensive and not all that easy to acquire.

Anonymous ID: 232d6c Dec. 25, 2020, 7:11 p.m. No.12177641   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7669

>>12177598

Clever how you masked out the face of the watch but compared the bottom band to the top band, said it didn't match and called it debunked. NOW, YOU have been debunked. Fucking shill… gtfo.

Anonymous ID: 232d6c Dec. 25, 2020, 7:12 p.m. No.12177661   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7685 >>7734

>>12177643

No it wasn't! Go back and look! They tricked you! They flipped the pic, hid the face of the watch and compared the top band to the bottom band! Compare them to the watch in the Q picture and they match perfectly!