Anonymous ID: 835d1b Dec. 26, 2020, 7:16 a.m. No.12182694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2724

>>12182647

Well, it is kinda possible.

Do a terror so I can story is a meme that cuts deep because of many such cases.

The old banner simply leaves QR too exposed to the media attacks Q has warned about in the later drops.

You can argue the possibility from an impact (low vs high) standpoint, but logic dictates that the vulnerability does exist and is not 0% negative impact rate.

Anonymous ID: 835d1b Dec. 26, 2020, 7:24 a.m. No.12182756   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2774

>>12182724

Disclaimers are meaningless.

The catalog page with a bunch of ~~Q_ANON~~ splattered over Iwo ima for as far as the eye can browse moar is what gets capped.

Slap a headline next to the cap and now everything Q pointed out that they're doing gets another +1.

What's tiresome is your steadfast refusal to accept the facts on the ground.

Anonymous ID: 835d1b Dec. 26, 2020, 7:30 a.m. No.12182810   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12182774

> social media

What does a large portion of SM do?

They parrot out MSM ~~Q_ANON~~ attack articles.

What does your drop talk about?

Ending the Great Anon Revolt and restoring the Notables back to their glory.

If Q has the same intentions for the old banner then that will be comm'd likewise.

Until then it's a logical choice to follow Q's advice about distancing ourselves away from the media created namefagging.

Anonymous ID: 835d1b Dec. 26, 2020, 7:48 a.m. No.12182985   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2997

>>12182964

Q dropping ~~Q_ANON~~ has to go much later in the drop timeline played a huge role.

To make it sound like 3 years with no guidance then outta the blue it's changed is disingenuous.