Anonymous ID: 27fd50 Dec. 26, 2020, 10:04 a.m. No.12184373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4381 >>4388 >>4608 >>4697 >>4747

Reposting this, with a few more comments below it:

 

Here is my humble theory on what happened in Nashville:

 

Military Intelligence, beginning on November 7th, began to scope the scene over the AT&T building in preparation of its operation.

 

Some anon had posted last night a reminder of helicopters swarming Nashville from Nov. 7th through the 9th:

 

>>12180018 pb

 

Milint placed the RV on the street on the 24th to accustom local residences of its presence to lessen suspicion on the night of the op.

 

The team then arrived in the RV on the early morning of Dec. 25th to access those servers for the data relative to the GA elections, upon which a gun battle ensued.

 

The timing of the three sets of shootings would seem to indicate an initial meeting, followed by a larger volley when access was breached, and then another volley when the team exited.

 

The hostile actors however had an explosive device, possibly already in place, which they then initiated upon breach.

 

This was not unknown to Milint, thus the placement of the RV.

 

There was no time to disable the device, however, there was time for Milint to access the servers to retrieve the data.

 

After the Milint team finished the OP, they existed the area, remotely initiating the RV warnings.

 

There are a few tunnels in the area under that location, enabling them to retreat to a pick up location without being seen.

 

Feel free to trash it, Anons!

.........................................................

 

Ok, a couple of points, one directly related, one indirectly related:

 

The witnesses saying the gun shots seemed to be recorded as coming from the RV:

the reason could be Milint accessed below street level under the RV.

Would be interesting to figure out the location of the RV and find if below street access or even a breach appears in that location where the RV had been parked.

 

Next, regarding the post from halfchan (is that the right name?), with the picture of the "old man".

Isn't that Ron Johnson?

 

>>12180244