Okay, I'm updating my theory from yesterday.
See (pb)
I'm dropping the self destruct bullshit based on new imagery I've seen, and I'm thinking my post yesterday was about 80% correct.
I'm now thinking that yes, there was indeed some kind of bunker under that nashville at&t building, and that yes, it definitely was the target of the attack.
Proof bunker was there is this wierd street light that looks suspiciously like someone was trying to camouflage an air intake / exhaust. Black guy hanging around may be plainclothes security.
There were certainly tunnels under the bomb site, see google street view.
The tunnels appear to be heaved up and out away from the foundation. This doesn't gel unless there was an internal explosion from within the building.
What had me stumped for awhile was what caused that hole on the second floor. Then I thought maybe it was a bomb coming in, and if you wanted to bust a bunker but minimise civilian casualties/damage you'd try and drop it in through the basement at a wierd angle.
We know the military has had this capability since desert storm 1 (bomb down chimney), so this isn't really that far fetched.
So quick sequence of events as I see them:
Bomb smashes through masonry side of the building, drops through the floor into the sub basement, hits something hard, blows up, blast propagates through the tunnels and pushes them up and out.
The question here, again, is, why?
The warning from the RV was clearly meant to minimize civilian casualties in the area, that throws all terrorist bullshit out the window for me.
Why do I think maybe air dropped ordinance now?
https://youtu.be/U6aM7WHm-NA
Some bunker busting bombs have a rocket assist to speed up their fall toward the target. That rocket assist leaves a smoke trail going toward the ground…