>>12185101 pb

So did the Norway blue spiral; if you see the timing of it.with the Space X 37 "mystery flights" from over a decade ago.

>>12185078 pb

>>12185151 pb

This is good because D.C. is really ugly , cold and looks like Something from behind the iron curtain.

So much so I dread going there and basically never do.

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/19/nsa-33-thomas-street-att-new-york-photos-inside

>>12185155 pb

There's also an Owl building in Chicago

>>12185160 pb

doctored photo

>>12185164 pb

this was known by finance people 15 years ago, "Center of Civilization moving East to China;" "USA no longer has the man power;; blah blah blah"

Also

"Will they invade us?"

long pause

"Ah, why should they? It's wide open [for the taking]"

>>12184860 pb

doesn't bother to mention; China caused the virus which made certain nominal "Communists" billions.

Nixon was the first to have a rapprochement with China

"Nixon in China" he visited there 02-29-1972

It was considered a big deal at the time. Though history somewhat buried?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixon%27s_1972_visit_to_China

At the time "it was said" (promoted in the broadcast Media) that if it was a Democrat the POTUS could never have "gotten away with it" and there would've been a public outcry.

But since he was a Republican his visit there was considered safe for us.

(See how the two sides of the same coin, play?)

So that started the normalization of relations, to the point Americans had a buying spree of Chinese goods and never bother to remember the regime there used slaves so we could have our baubles.

And yes, the undercut our local businesses on price

But how are we, a free people, supposed to compete with slave labor?

This is some of the reason given by progressives / radicals against doctrine of 'free trade" that is Human Rights. & labor fairness.

But the "Free Trade" was given to the public as a "non choice" "inevitability" "fait accompli"

only way to combat it was to refuse to buy the Chinese goods; but most Americans by necessity choose by better price, not idealism;

Whole thing wasn't fault of the "consumer" in any case

>>12184985 pb

I can assume these AT&T buildings have a back door to China?