dChan
Anonymous ID: 3711c4 Dec. 26, 2020, 4:26 p.m. No.12188782   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8835 >>8862 >>8996 >>9012

>>12188726

 

Ok, that works… so last question. Because I agree that the RV story is BS. As there are cameras everywhere these days and we only have one picture of it.

 

Who stands to gain by the destruction of data in this NSA hub? I would suggest only black hats. But if it were black hats why did they warn everyone before hand?

Anonymous ID: 3711c4 Dec. 26, 2020, 4:37 p.m. No.12188936   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8958 >>9011 >>9041

>>12188823

 

Agreed… and if it were a white hat op… isn’t the NSA supposedly white hat?

 

I think the bunker bomb theory is too complicated. Too much could easily go wrong with that too.

 

I suspect as others have said, the building was breached (round 1 of gunfire). A bomb detonation was initiated, triggering the alarm. Those who breached the building got into another fire fight in the building (round 2 gunfire). Those who breached the building exited the building (third gunfight). Explosion then happened.

Anonymous ID: 3711c4 Dec. 26, 2020, 5:17 p.m. No.12189329   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9357 >>9380

>>12189041

 

So let’s say it was controlled demolitions. Which makes sense if you want to get rid of data, you blow out every server you want destroyed. Nothing can be tracked or traced.

 

  1. First set of detonations.

  2. Building Alarm goes off warning everyone about an imminent explosion.

  3. Second set of detonations go off.

  4. Third set of detonations go off. Now all servers are destroyed.

  5. Big explosion goes off destroying all other evidence, leaving no trail behind.

 

Everything points to this being a white hat operation. It’s an NSA building and the advanced warning. To me this is the most plausible explanation yet due to Ockham’s Razor.

 

This leaves one question that I can see. What did they have that they did not want the black hats to have?