30,000 foot view on Lin Wood and Nashville:

What do we know

• AT&T data center had obvious importance as a telecom backbone node and probable NSA collection source.

• Timing and lack of casualties point to a white hat op

• Supposed "RV" is way too convenient, and designed to create a possible picture of a 'Qanaon' FF, or possibily just to help the news fixate on the persona of Anthony Quinn Warner

-Lin Wood drawing clear linkage between himself, Anthony Quinn Warner, and Richard Jewell via a couple of recent tweets, and indicating both of those personas are FF's.

-Antioch was one of the keystone locations of the early Church, bringing together Jews and Gentiles alike, It dealt with growing pains as a result of the 'awakening' being spread at that time.

I think it is highly likely that Warner, Jewell, and Lin Wood are just actors in this play. Personas. Real or just invented for Twitter? I have proposed a similar theory about Ron, Jim, and Snowden. A movie has a script, and a script needs actors. All along the way there have been various 'tells' like Lin Wood is giving us now.

>>12190584

Researching this topic for mom anon, and the more detailed explanation is a "carrier molecule" transports the RNA code into the cell. But it is not a bacterial or viral "cultured cell", but simply a "molecule". It is fragile against your body's own defenses, therefore has a 'coating' which allows it to survive long enough to pass the instruction to the DNA in the nucleus.

Still leaves a lot of questions unanswered. But the central difference is there is no cultured cell line invovled to carry the RNA. Previous vaccines all used human-derived cell lines, or various animal-derived cell lines.

>>12190624

You could answer most of these questions with a little research. Covid vaccine research began with SARS and MERS, but were never completed due to lack of funding from those viruses dying out. SARS-Cov-2 is closely related to the original SARS-Cov and therefor was used as the starting point in continuiing development of these vaccines.

Some of the current vaccines use the traditional cell-line approach, such as AstraZeneca. A few use the newer mRNA approach, like Pfizer and Moderna.

So in terms of risk, it would appear to be a tossup between 'traditional' cell derived vaccines, which introduce a 'reduced' version of the actual virus into your body; vs. the mRNA technique which just passes along part of the code to your DNA, which is apparently enough for the body's immune system to mount a response. mRNA being new, we don't really know any of the long term risks.

Please research this stuff anons, before presuming too much. There are a lot of assumptions I had that were just plain wrong. I still won't be taking it, because I don't perceive the virus itself as risky to get. 99.9% survival rate is good enough for me.

>>12190776

Been noticing an uptick overall in "Breaking" events for the last year at least. The overall effect is to make most Breaking events turn out to be false.

I kinda wonder if that has been purposeful. Just flood the comms channels with a shitstorm, in other words. Its having an effect on me because I'm so jaded about it all that mostly I don't believe anything. 9/10 of the stuff we pass around here even, turned out to not happen.

I guess we will know the final event when it comes.

>>12190791

Then please enlighten us, because I have been research this stuff for the better part of a week, and that is the description of how it works.

I would love a better description if you have more detail.

>>12190880

Which sounds a lot like the instruction in the RNA is passed to the DNA, as I said. But it supposedly does not enter the nucleus, is the description I have.

>>12190898

'baby parts' are not part of the mRNA vaccine.

You are thinking of normal vaccines, which use a human or animal cell culture as the basis of transporting the virus. The original cell lines from 40-50 years ago (fetus) are still being used today, although they are described as 'descended' cells.

It makes some people squeamish, but would you rather have a human cell as the basis, or a monkey cell? An insect cell? A chicken egg cell? These are the common methods with most vaccines, prior to mRNA.

I won't be taking either one, just stating the difference.