Anonymous ID: 3cd9d4 Dec. 26, 2020, 8:09 p.m. No.12191081   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1162

Funny how many of the shills' memes are lifted right of the pages of these trashy conspiracy theory magazines (psy-ops). These magazines are just traps set for the admirably inquisitive minds; the guys who know they're not getting the truth, so they goes off the reservation and then swallows a whole other set of lies. Of course SOME small sliver of what these trashy mags say is accurate. That's part of the con: mix truth with fiction, and you taint the truth itself with poison, while distracting from the bigger more dangerous unspoken truths.

Anonymous ID: 3cd9d4 Dec. 26, 2020, 8:20 p.m. No.12191204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1264 >>1327

>>12191131

Wow, Gates is totally floundering. His fake science background is really showing here. And again begs the question: why are there multiple vaccines and how are they actually different, specifically? Why can't we hear the science behind these new vaccines and the distinctions between the different company approaches? Why, scientifically, are the other vaccines able to go with "lower doses" and get a good response? He's also very vague about what these supposedly "not super severe side-effects" really are. "Not super serious" does not sound "super scientific" nor "super reassuring" to me.

 

He says these "not super severe" side-effects weren't "permanent"…but given how they keep saying we don't really know anything about the long-term efficacy of the vaccine itself, why on earth would we know the long-term effect of the side-effects?

Anonymous ID: 3cd9d4 Dec. 26, 2020, 8:22 p.m. No.12191223   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1261

Would you trust whatever COVID vaccine this man endorses, given that the side-effects are not "super serious" and "not permanent" (cough, cough).