>>12190927

(LB)

Correct, but it is the mechanism of exactly how this is done that needs further explanation. People are nervous that these mRNA's are getting into the nucleus and altering their DNA. And I keep reading that is not what is happening, although I don't have a good explanation as to why not.

My understanding is the cell nucleus 'aquires info' from the RNA to produce a 'Spike Protein'. The spike protein is what is critical to the immune response. Is the cell DNA being 'altered' during this process? I think that is the central fear that people have.

>>12191093

No. You have them mixed up. mRNA are not "cellular derived". They don't use human OR animal cells as their basis. The best description I have from my own research is they use a 'molecule' to carry the messenger RNA instruction. A molecule of what I'm not sure, but it is not a human or animal cell.

Human or animal cells are the typical carrier for all the normal vaccines we are familiar with. So whichever vaccines you have had in the past, contained some strain of human fetal cells or animal cells.

>>12191110

KEK

Never any way to reconcile his past predictions that didn't happen, with what he is predicting now. F&G