>>12192991

The Schiff staff put out a message on the day the rumor twat appeared that said Schiff was at his home in MD. Called the twat RW conspiracy business as usual, all bullshit.

His staff, though, nothing from Schiff himself, AFAIK. Don't know if has appeared on TV in the meantime. Should be right up Schiff's alley, laughing on TV about opponent's bullshit

ATM, Schiff would need a live video clip standing in front of the US Capitol with his birth certificate, passports and a newspaper turned to last night's sport's scores for anons to believe him.

>>12193036

My first reaction hearing AT&T was NSA, Snowden & PRISM surveillance program. None of it makes sense to me if I assumes (Yeah, I know) that NSA are the good guys and bad guys attacking announce for all the clear area.

People who know what's going on are playing it close to their vests, or, at best, dropping esoteric hints.

Wictor would be more credible if he pointed out his ideas on isolated details, while also admitting he doesn't have a fucking clue wrt the big picture in some cases. Looking at his stuff over the years, it seems to me he has a problem with doing that.

>>12193149

Thinking CCP firewall data, running in a VMWare hypervisor, along with the backup (mirror). Who took the picture and whose has the material on those drives?

Crosses my mind that Eric Schmidt was rumored to help NK with there tech infrastructure. Does that apply to China as well?

Message being sent that Google is not going to have a happy New Year?

Pic of Sierra Nevada bottle shows Hops IPA (India Pale Ale). Ale uses a top fermenting yeast that doesn't need to be stored cold like a Lager. Process goes from vats to the buyer quicker and without storage costs in the brewery.

>>12193180

He didn't handle the appearance of Q and the explosion of interest in 4-chan well.

He blew up all over Twitter, then had to write an twat a short time later saying he's on a lot of meds and sometimes it causes him to react like that.

Very interesting ideas, and I sometimes read his stuff, but although the specifics seem solid, I don't trust the 'glue' he uses to tie them all together.

Like the "expert" on WW1 flamethrowers claim; a lot of interesting stories and old clippings, but who the fuck would know if the "rest of the story", the conclusions he draws from the clippings and pictures, are correct? An "expert", on a topic that has no possibility to be peer reviewed.