Anonymous ID: 884f65 Dec. 27, 2020, 8:25 a.m. No.12195953   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6006 >>6155 >>6212 >>6235 >>6306 >>6339 >>6399 >>6428 >>6465 >>6530

I'm gonna keep running with my theory that the bombing in nashville was a hardened gravity bomb.

 

Specifically, this hardened gravity bomb:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-27_Paveway_III

 

Why that specific bomb?

 

Planefags, remember the f117's that were seen flying around off the west coast? Why would old mothballed stealth fighters be dragged out of mothballs if there wasn't a need for them? The paveway 3 was designed for that aircraft.

 

Red line is the path of the bomb I think. Green dotted line would be path it continued on inside the building.

 

Yellow is ejecta fans on the street, purple is where the fireball that came out of the underground messed up the building the worst.

 

And if there's any doubt about my claim that that at&t building is a hardened structure look at the shit across the street. All of the fronts of the buildings collapsed while that metal emp cladding on the outside of at&t building is mostly unscathed.

 

I've seen claims that the "rv bomb" could have been up to 2000 lbs in size. (they're going with the amfo bullshit again"

 

Well, here's what 4800 lbs supposedly did to the IRS in oklahoma city:

 

https://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2014_31/588661/140728-oklahoma-city-bombing-1610_45ab173c206ff1f7bd239c6a42ab9cff.fit-2000w.jpg

 

That at&t building mostly doesn't care. They also seem to be going with the "disgruntled ex employee" bullshit theory.. any disgruntled ex employee would be well aware of how over-engineered at&t's facilities are.

 

On the other hand if you had access to building drawings and specifications for at&t's hardened buildings (many of which are still classified) you'd know exactly where to drop the bomb, and how much bomb you'd need to do the job.

 

at&t's building performed precisely as designed.

 

All those windows around the first floor were there for over-pressure relief. Let the blast travel through the first floor mostly uninterrupted; same idea they use in the NORAD tunnels. A bigass steel door at right angles to the tunnel to keep the blast out as it goes by uninterrupted.

 

A surface explosion simply wouldn't do the job, they had to drop that fucker down a stairwell, and that's exactly what they did.

 

The evacuation announcement was just hearts and minds bullshit for the benefit of the plane pilot and other military personnel who would have probably mutinied if they knew they were dropping ordinance on US soil in a city and there would be civilian casualties.

Anonymous ID: 884f65 Dec. 27, 2020, 8:52 a.m. No.12196238   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12196212

 

That hole on the second floor is where the bomb went through the well into the building. The skew of the camera angle makes it kinda funky to try and draw.

Anonymous ID: 884f65 Dec. 27, 2020, 8:59 a.m. No.12196310   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6337

>>12196284

 

The gbu-27 is based off of the BLU-109 bomb.

 

The new void sensing fuze was designed for the BLU-109 bomb.

 

Meaning you now have a laser guided bunker busting bomb, with a void sensing fuze.

Anonymous ID: 884f65 Dec. 27, 2020, 9:08 a.m. No.12196387   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6457 >>6533 >>6541

>>12196337

>And that means it will change totally in it's detonation characteristics

 

Yes. Because you can change when it detonates after impact within the structure. If you know how many walls/floors it has to pass through before blowing up, you can set it to count how many it smashes through before doing so. Giant fireball went straight up as it blew because an explosion travels in the direction of least resistance. If you put a bomb in the bottom of a hole what direction has the least resistance?

 

>>12196339

 

Drones have insufficient payload capacity for the suggested bomb.

Anonymous ID: 884f65 Dec. 27, 2020, 9:19 a.m. No.12196519   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12196457

Where are you getting this moving fireball bullshit? And yes, a fireball shot out of the buildings with momentum. You wouldn't have debris all over the street originating from inside the buildings in opposing directions if you didn't. There was no surface detonation above, at, or near the surface and camera angles that support that claim. Your fireball above the street was the explosion out-gassing through ventilation ducts and access ports. That is why there is also strange damage at the top of the at&t building where the HVAC equipment is.

Anonymous ID: 884f65 Dec. 27, 2020, 9:21 a.m. No.12196536   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12196337

Incidentally smashing a bunker that's buried under a large building and smashing a large concrete block in an open desert are two different things so your comparison between the two is invalid.