Here's the Image I couldn't locate in time to link to OG post
>Point is that "Ablation" is the proper term for what we were witnessing in the sky regardless in what model of the universe we choose to discuss this shit.
My point is, the terminology is useless if the explanation attached is based off false and misleading premises. Your just repeating the word they used to describe something inaccurately. If the manner in which they describe be inaccurate, then the word they attach to the likes there of is entirely redundant. As the definition of said word is based upon science fiction, not fact.
If you say it is "ablation", and someone then goes to look up the definition to better understand, only to get a falsified version of what is really taking place, then what happened is NOT "ablation".
Apologies for any disagreement. But I'm not the one to sit idly by as to allow a fraud to continue. The fraud is not your fault, and I do not have any beef with you, anon. My beef is with the institutions who have perpetuated such a fraud. Especially since children are forced to go along with the fraud, or they get penalized for being "wrong" according to (fake) "science". Even moar disturbing than a simple bad grade on a test, some of these children are labelled as having a "learning disability" for "failing" to comprehend (false and/or misleading) "science", and then DRUGGED because "science says…" that is an acceptable solution for any and all who disagree with "science"…