Sorry formatting fucked

">>12198936 lb

>The visibility of meteors is a consequence of the high velocity of meteoroids in interplanetary space. Before entering the region of the Earth's gravitational influence, their velocities range from a few kilometres per second up to as high as 72 kilometres per second. As they approach the Earth, within a few Earth radii, they are accelerated to even higher velocities by the planet's gravitational field

Yo. Your answer is false, regardless of what "science says…"

The "visibility" is caused by the charge differential between space rock and our atmosphere. The reaction is Electrical, not "gravitational". The "glow" is the result of plasma, whereby the voltage potential, between "space rock" and our lower atmosphere, is increased to satisfy conditions necessary for what's known as "glow mode". If the voltage potential increases even greater, the result may be "arc mode". This is why most "space rocks" will never result in kinetic impacts. The closer the charged body gets to the surface of Earth, the shorter the spark gap between the surface of our planet and said "space rock", which still carries the relative charge of the "space" it had originated. Might sound far-fetched, but if you study the known Physics regarding the Electromagnetic Force, you will see rather quickly that it is certainly based, regardless if anon sucks at explaining.

Gravity if a function of the Electromagnetic Force, fyi. "Science" has been defrauding the general public, at the very least, since Einstein. Dude was also a fraud. He retarded the field of physics by several centuries.

Everything in Nature is Electromagnetic. Everything. Including "Life"

>>12199249

Damn it…..meant to reply to this but this computer does whack shit. Point is that "Ablation" is the proper term for what we were witnessing in the sky regardless in what model of the universe we choose to discuss this shit.

>>12199303

This needs to be addressed….the contrail is not necessarily the "tell-tale" sign of a thermobaric weapon, though that is not to say it was not. It could just as easily be the contrail of a last second rocket assist bunker busting bomb which may or may not be thermobaric, albeit quite likely, there's no need to speculate on the ordinance type.

>>12199384

nope…that was still a fucking bomb…the DEW satellite is what just got knocked out of the sky.

>>12199413

The point is that you can't sperg out about a term from the most widely accepted and conventional model of the universe being used to accurately describe the phenomena witnessed over Kentucky especially when it is used to differentiate it from combustion.

You would be well served to read up on "model agnosticism" (Robert Anton Wilson would be a good start) so as to not be such a model/belief system (BS) nazi where it is not needed. This is not an Electric Universe board, nor does it need to take on the Flat Earther shill vibe that your sperging out here creates, regardless who had the most accurate model of the universe. We are trying to figure out what's happening in the sphere of human geopolitics of which the shit falling out of the sky is a likely product. It matters not what prevailing model of the universe is employed. Also, if we all agree to join in and update to the electrical model, we will still likely use the term "ablation" to describe the phenomenon discussed as having a different mechanism. Such is the nature of epistemology, that we do not have to invent an entirely new lexicon whenever deeper or differing understandings are reached.

So, yes, from now on you should stand by and refrain from pushing electric universe BS where it is absolutely not fucking relevant!

>>12199595

Whatever it was, it was small. Like a firecracker compared to a 30,000 lb bomb, just big enough to get the job done. A scalpel, not a sword.

>>12199490

Because it ablated into the atmosphere like a meteor.

>>12199757

YUM YUMMM

>>12199274

Maybe, but something suspicious about Gaetz. Could be leading coopting effort.